* Question about a strange behavior of copy_to_user() in ioctl call
@ 2007-06-19 0:53 News Letter
2007-06-19 7:54 ` Jiri Slaby
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: News Letter @ 2007-06-19 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
I need some help here to understand copy_to_user(). I encountered a
strange copy_to_user() behavior when working on CentOS from Redhat
(kernel version 2.6.9-22.ELsmp, x86_64 CPU).
For a kernel module, I wrote a ioctl call to allow user mode program
to get some kernel data information. When a user program called the
ioctl, most of the time the ioctl failed with EFAULT, failed at
copy_to_user(). It succeeded a few times after a lot of running.
Failed message indicated copy_to_user() returned 3840 (which is
exactly what is asked to copy, PAGE_SIZE-256). The printed value of
the user pointer were identical for successful ioctl calls and failed
ioctl calls. Some relevant details are at the end of this email. I
tried with calloc(PAGE_SIZE, 1), static buffer and automatic variable
on stack in user mode program. They gave the same result.
I appreciate any help.
Best,
Jasper
The ioctl call structure is defined as follows,
struct ioctl_get_info
{
... /* some other information */
unsigned long user_pointer;
unsigned user_buffer_len;
unsigned returned_len;
... /* some other information */
};
Inside kernel module, a page is allocated with :
static unsigned char *test_page;
static init_test(void)
{
test_page = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
if (!test_page)
.... /* some error handling */
}
static int test_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp,
unsigned int cmd_in, unsigned long arg)
{
struct ioctl_get_info igi;
unsigned size;
unsigned long remain;
size = IOC_SIZE(cmd_in);
if (size != sizeof(igi))
....
... /* some sanity checking */
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, (char *)arg, size))
{
printk(KERN_INFO "...");
return -EFAULT;
}
if (copy_from_user(&igi, (char *)arg, size) != 0)
{
printk(... ...)
return -EFAULT;
}
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, (char *)igi.user_pointer, igi.user_buffer_len))
{
printk(...);
return -EFAULT;
}
size = PAGE_SIZE - 256;
if (size > igi.user_buffer_len)
size = igi.user_buffer_len;
printk("igi.user_pointer %p size %u\n", igi.user_pointer, size);
if ((remain = copy_to_user((char *)igi.user_pointer, page + 256, size)) != 0)
{
printk ("Failed to copy from user at %p remain %lu asked %u\n",
igi.user_pointer, remain, asked);
/* failed here */
return -EFAULT;
}
igi.returned_len = size;
/* copy other information */
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Question about a strange behavior of copy_to_user() in ioctl call
2007-06-19 0:53 Question about a strange behavior of copy_to_user() in ioctl call News Letter
@ 2007-06-19 7:54 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-06-19 14:59 ` News Letter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2007-06-19 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: News Letter; +Cc: linux-kernel
News Letter napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> I need some help here to understand copy_to_user(). I encountered a
> strange copy_to_user() behavior when working on CentOS from Redhat
> (kernel version 2.6.9-22.ELsmp, x86_64 CPU).
>
> For a kernel module, I wrote a ioctl call to allow user mode program
> to get some kernel data information. When a user program called the
> ioctl, most of the time the ioctl failed with EFAULT, failed at
> copy_to_user(). It succeeded a few times after a lot of running.
>
> Failed message indicated copy_to_user() returned 3840 (which is
> exactly what is asked to copy, PAGE_SIZE-256). The printed value of
> the user pointer were identical for successful ioctl calls and failed
> ioctl calls. Some relevant details are at the end of this email. I
> tried with calloc(PAGE_SIZE, 1), static buffer and automatic variable
> on stack in user mode program. They gave the same result.
>
> I appreciate any help.
>
> Best,
> Jasper
>
> The ioctl call structure is defined as follows,
>
> struct ioctl_get_info
> {
> ... /* some other information */
> unsigned long user_pointer;
> unsigned user_buffer_len;
> unsigned returned_len;
> ... /* some other information */
> };
>
> Inside kernel module, a page is allocated with :
>
> static unsigned char *test_page;
>
> static init_test(void)
> {
> test_page = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> if (!test_page)
> .... /* some error handling */
> }
>
> static int test_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp,
> unsigned int cmd_in, unsigned long arg)
> {
> struct ioctl_get_info igi;
> unsigned size;
> unsigned long remain;
>
> size = IOC_SIZE(cmd_in);
> if (size != sizeof(igi))
> ....
>
> ... /* some sanity checking */
>
> if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, (char *)arg, size))
> {
> printk(KERN_INFO "...");
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> if (copy_from_user(&igi, (char *)arg, size) != 0)
> {
> printk(... ...)
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, (char *)igi.user_pointer,
> igi.user_buffer_len))
> {
> printk(...);
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> size = PAGE_SIZE - 256;
> if (size > igi.user_buffer_len)
> size = igi.user_buffer_len;
> printk("igi.user_pointer %p size %u\n", igi.user_pointer, size);
Weird. Are you sure, that previous access_ok doesn't fail with this 'size', not
the 'igi.user_buffer_len'? Anyway, you can remove these access_ok checks, since
they are provided by copy_from/to_user after debugging.
> if ((remain = copy_to_user((char *)igi.user_pointer, page + 256,
> size)) != 0)
> {
> printk ("Failed to copy from user at %p remain %lu asked %u\n",
> igi.user_pointer, remain, asked);
> /* failed here */
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> igi.returned_len = size;
>
> /* copy other information */
>
> return 0;
> }
regards,
--
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/ Jiri Slaby
faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz
e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint:
B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8 22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Question about a strange behavior of copy_to_user() in ioctl call
2007-06-19 7:54 ` Jiri Slaby
@ 2007-06-19 14:59 ` News Letter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: News Letter @ 2007-06-19 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Slaby; +Cc: linux-kernel
Thank you for your reply. I put the access_ok() as a debugging tool. I
suspected that copy_to_user() failed at the access_ok() test. It is
for debugging.
I did replace copy_from_user() with __copy_from_user(). It gave out
the same result.
On 6/19/07, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> wrote:
> News Letter napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need some help here to understand copy_to_user(). I encountered a
> > strange copy_to_user() behavior when working on CentOS from Redhat
> > (kernel version 2.6.9-22.ELsmp, x86_64 CPU).
> >
> > For a kernel module, I wrote a ioctl call to allow user mode program
> > to get some kernel data information. When a user program called the
> > ioctl, most of the time the ioctl failed with EFAULT, failed at
> > copy_to_user(). It succeeded a few times after a lot of running.
> >
> > Failed message indicated copy_to_user() returned 3840 (which is
> > exactly what is asked to copy, PAGE_SIZE-256). The printed value of
> > the user pointer were identical for successful ioctl calls and failed
> > ioctl calls. Some relevant details are at the end of this email. I
> > tried with calloc(PAGE_SIZE, 1), static buffer and automatic variable
> > on stack in user mode program. They gave the same result.
> >
> > I appreciate any help.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jasper
> >
> > The ioctl call structure is defined as follows,
> >
> > struct ioctl_get_info
> > {
> > ... /* some other information */
> > unsigned long user_pointer;
> > unsigned user_buffer_len;
> > unsigned returned_len;
> > ... /* some other information */
> > };
> >
> > Inside kernel module, a page is allocated with :
> >
> > static unsigned char *test_page;
> >
> > static init_test(void)
> > {
> > test_page = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> > if (!test_page)
> > .... /* some error handling */
> > }
> >
> > static int test_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp,
> > unsigned int cmd_in, unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > struct ioctl_get_info igi;
> > unsigned size;
> > unsigned long remain;
> >
> > size = IOC_SIZE(cmd_in);
> > if (size != sizeof(igi))
> > ....
> >
> > ... /* some sanity checking */
> >
> > if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, (char *)arg, size))
> > {
> > printk(KERN_INFO "...");
> > return -EFAULT;
> > }
> >
> > if (copy_from_user(&igi, (char *)arg, size) != 0)
> > {
> > printk(... ...)
> > return -EFAULT;
> > }
> >
> > if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, (char *)igi.user_pointer,
> > igi.user_buffer_len))
> > {
> > printk(...);
> > return -EFAULT;
> > }
> >
> > size = PAGE_SIZE - 256;
> > if (size > igi.user_buffer_len)
> > size = igi.user_buffer_len;
> > printk("igi.user_pointer %p size %u\n", igi.user_pointer, size);
>
> Weird. Are you sure, that previous access_ok doesn't fail with this 'size', not
> the 'igi.user_buffer_len'? Anyway, you can remove these access_ok checks, since
> they are provided by copy_from/to_user after debugging.
>
> > if ((remain = copy_to_user((char *)igi.user_pointer, page + 256,
> > size)) != 0)
> > {
> > printk ("Failed to copy from user at %p remain %lu asked %u\n",
> > igi.user_pointer, remain, asked);
> > /* failed here */
> > return -EFAULT;
> > }
> > igi.returned_len = size;
> >
> > /* copy other information */
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> regards,
> --
> http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/ Jiri Slaby
> faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz
> e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint:
> B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8 22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-19 15:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-19 0:53 Question about a strange behavior of copy_to_user() in ioctl call News Letter
2007-06-19 7:54 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-06-19 14:59 ` News Letter
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.