All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lively <dlively@virtualiron.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: ignoring xenbus state transitions during shutdown
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:28:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46802562.9010604@virtualiron.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C2A5CC41.1147D%keir@xensource.com>

Ok --  the .shutdown callbacks are there for Linux kernels >= 2.6.16.  
So I think I want to protect this (ignore transitions) code with:
#if defined(CONFIG_KEXEC) || LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,16)

(That is, ignore state transitions if kexec is enabled or if we're 
defining the shutdown callbacks.)

Right?  (Or should I instead test only for CONFIG_KEXEC there and leave 
the shutdown callbacks NULL unless KEXEC is enabled??  Either way works 
for the cases I care about.)

Dave

Keir Fraser wrote:
> Unless you care about domU kexec, you can pretty safely remove that
> system_state() check, so long as you remove the .shutdown callback hooks (in
> the same file) too.
>
>  -- Keir
>
> On 25/6/07 19:41, "David Lively" <dlively@virtualiron.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi Folks -
>>   In otherend_changed() in xenbus_probe.c, the driver is trying to
>> ignore xenbus state transitions while the guest OS is shutting down.  It
>> currently does this by looking for system_state > SYSTEM_RUNNING.  But
>> system_state is not exported by some kernels that use it (e.g., SLES9
>> running in a HVM guest), so the xenbus driver can't be loaded.
>>   The comments indicate we're trying to avoid a failure that occurs when
>> there is no rootfs.  I haven't yet seen this failure (after removing the
>> code my shutdowns with PV drivers seemed to work fine, though I haven't
>> pushed hard yet), but I suspect I shouldn't be ignoring it.  I was
>> thinking it might be better to test for the screw condition (no rootfs)
>> directly, perhaps something like try vfs_stat("/", &stat) and see
>> whether it fails (??).  (These state transitions are relatively rare, so
>> it doesn't need to be a particularly cheap test.)
>>   Any other suggestions?  I've heard of the old global 'system_running',
>> but that's not used SLES9, at least.
>>
>> Thanks in Advance,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>     
>
>   

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-25 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-25 18:41 ignoring xenbus state transitions during shutdown David Lively
2007-06-25 18:47 ` Keir Fraser
2007-06-25 20:28   ` David Lively [this message]
2007-06-25 20:39     ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46802562.9010604@virtualiron.com \
    --to=dlively@virtualiron.com \
    --cc=keir@xensource.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.