From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
hadi@cyberus.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] NET: [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:20:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <468409E4.7000603@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D5C1322C3E673F459512FB59E0DDC329031F061E@orsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
>>Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
>>
>>Yes, I noticed that now. Doesn't seem right though as long as
>>queueing while queue is stopped is treated as a bug by the
>>drivers.
>>
>>But I vaguely recall seeing a discussion about this, I'll check
>>the archives.
>
>
> The basic gist is before the dequeue is done, the qdisc is locked by the
> qdisc is running bit, so another CPU cannot get in there. So if the
> queue isn't stopped when a dequeue is done, that same queue should not
> be stopped when hard_start_xmit() is called. The only thing I could
> think of that could happen is some out-of-band cleanup routine in the
> driver where the tx_ring lock is held, and the skb is bounced back,
> where the driver returns NETIF_TX_BUSY, and you requeue. This is an
> extreme corner case, so the check could be removed.
Yes, but there are users that don't go through qdiscs, like netpoll,
Having them check the QDISC_RUNNING bit seems ugly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-28 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-28 16:20 [PATCH] NET: Multiple queue hardware support PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-28 16:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] NET: [DOC] Multiqueue hardware support documentation PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-28 16:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] NET: [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-28 16:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 17:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 19:00 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 19:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 19:06 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 19:20 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2007-06-28 19:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-28 19:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 21:11 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 21:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 23:08 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 23:31 ` David Miller
2007-06-28 20:39 ` David Miller
2007-06-29 3:39 ` David Miller
2007-06-29 10:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-28 16:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] NET: [SCHED] Qdisc changes and sch_rr added for multiqueue PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-28 16:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 16:43 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 16:46 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 16:50 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 16:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 16:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 17:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 19:04 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 19:17 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 19:21 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 19:24 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 19:27 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-29 4:20 ` David Miller
2007-06-29 8:45 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-29 11:43 ` Multiqueue and virtualization WAS(Re: " jamal
2007-06-29 11:59 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-29 12:54 ` jamal
2007-06-29 13:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-29 13:19 ` jamal
2007-06-29 15:33 ` Ben Greear
2007-06-29 15:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-29 16:16 ` Ben Greear
2007-06-29 21:36 ` David Miller
2007-06-30 7:51 ` Benny Amorsen
2007-06-29 21:31 ` David Miller
2007-06-30 1:30 ` jamal
2007-06-30 4:35 ` David Miller
2007-06-30 14:52 ` jamal
2007-06-30 20:33 ` David Miller
2007-07-03 12:42 ` jamal
2007-07-03 21:24 ` David Miller
2007-07-04 2:20 ` jamal
2007-07-06 7:32 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-06 14:39 ` jamal
2007-07-06 15:59 ` James Chapman
2007-07-08 2:30 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-08 6:03 ` David Miller
2007-06-30 14:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-30 14:37 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 17:57 ` [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 17:57 ` [SCHED] Qdisc changes and sch_rr added for multiqueue Patrick McHardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-23 21:36 [PATCH] NET: Multiple queue hardware support PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-23 21:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] NET: [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-24 12:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-25 16:25 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-21 21:26 [PATCH] NET: Multiple queue hardware support PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-21 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] NET: [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API PJ Waskiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=468409E4.7000603@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.