From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, hadi@cyberus.ca, kaber@trash.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] NET: [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:54:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4684E4ED.90604@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070628.203956.18146513.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote:
> From: PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:21:13 -0700
>
>> -struct net_device *alloc_netdev(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
>> - void (*setup)(struct net_device *))
>> +struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mq(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
>> + void (*setup)(struct net_device *), int queue_count)
>> {
>> void *p;
>> struct net_device *dev;
>> @@ -3557,7 +3564,9 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
>> BUG_ON(strlen(name) >= sizeof(dev->name));
>>
>> /* ensure 32-byte alignment of both the device and private area */
>> - alloc_size = (sizeof(*dev) + NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST) & ~NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST;
>> + alloc_size = (sizeof(*dev) + NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST +
>> + (sizeof(struct net_device_subqueue) * queue_count)) &
>> + ~NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST;
>> alloc_size += sizeof_priv + NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST;
>>
>> p = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -3573,12 +3582,14 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
>> if (sizeof_priv)
>> dev->priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>>
>> + dev->egress_subqueue_count = queue_count;
>> +
>> dev->get_stats = internal_stats;
>> setup(dev);
>> strcpy(dev->name, name);
>> return dev;
>> }
>
> This isn't going to work.
>
> The pointer returned from netdev_priv() doesn't take into account the
> variable sized queues at the end of struct netdev, so we can stomp
> over the queues with the private area.
>
> This probably works by luck because of NETDEV_ALIGN.
>
> The simplest fix is to just make netdev_priv() use dev->priv,
> except when it's being initialized during allocation, and
> that's what I'm going to do when I apply your patch.
Ugh. That will reverse the gains we had with the current setup, won't it?
Also, what happens when we want to add ingress_queue[0] ?
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-29 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-28 16:20 [PATCH] NET: Multiple queue hardware support PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-28 16:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] NET: [DOC] Multiqueue hardware support documentation PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-28 16:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] NET: [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-28 16:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 17:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 19:00 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 19:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 19:06 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 19:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 19:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-28 19:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 21:11 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 21:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 23:08 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 23:31 ` David Miller
2007-06-28 20:39 ` David Miller
2007-06-29 3:39 ` David Miller
2007-06-29 10:54 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-06-28 16:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] NET: [SCHED] Qdisc changes and sch_rr added for multiqueue PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-28 16:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 16:43 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 16:46 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 16:50 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 16:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 16:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 17:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 19:04 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 19:17 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 19:21 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 19:24 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 19:27 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-29 4:20 ` David Miller
2007-06-29 8:45 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-29 11:43 ` Multiqueue and virtualization WAS(Re: " jamal
2007-06-29 11:59 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-29 12:54 ` jamal
2007-06-29 13:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-29 13:19 ` jamal
2007-06-29 15:33 ` Ben Greear
2007-06-29 15:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-29 16:16 ` Ben Greear
2007-06-29 21:36 ` David Miller
2007-06-30 7:51 ` Benny Amorsen
2007-06-29 21:31 ` David Miller
2007-06-30 1:30 ` jamal
2007-06-30 4:35 ` David Miller
2007-06-30 14:52 ` jamal
2007-06-30 20:33 ` David Miller
2007-07-03 12:42 ` jamal
2007-07-03 21:24 ` David Miller
2007-07-04 2:20 ` jamal
2007-07-06 7:32 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-06 14:39 ` jamal
2007-07-06 15:59 ` James Chapman
2007-07-08 2:30 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-08 6:03 ` David Miller
2007-06-30 14:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-30 14:37 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-28 17:57 ` [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API Patrick McHardy
2007-06-28 17:57 ` [SCHED] Qdisc changes and sch_rr added for multiqueue Patrick McHardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-23 21:36 [PATCH] NET: Multiple queue hardware support PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-23 21:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] NET: [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-24 12:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-25 16:25 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-06-21 21:26 [PATCH] NET: Multiple queue hardware support PJ Waskiewicz
2007-06-21 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] NET: [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API PJ Waskiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4684E4ED.90604@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.