All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC patch] firewire: add Kconfig help on building both stacks
@ 2007-06-25 20:18 Stefan Richter
  2007-06-29 19:35 ` call request_irq before or after hardware initialization? Li Juen Hwang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Richter @ 2007-06-25 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux1394-devel; +Cc: linux-kernel

Alas that won't work so good, because nobody reads help texts.

I thought about adding some crude multiple choice selection (build the
old stack, build the new stack, build both stacks).  It's possible, but
it would introduce awkward dummy config variables.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
---
 drivers/firewire/Kconfig |   66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Index: linux/drivers/firewire/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/firewire/Kconfig
+++ linux/drivers/firewire/Kconfig
@@ -4,27 +4,45 @@ comment "An alternative FireWire stack i
 	depends on EXPERIMENTAL=n
 
 config FIREWIRE
-	tristate "IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support (JUJU alternative stack, experimental)"
+	tristate "IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support (alternative stack, EXPERIMENTAL)"
 	depends on EXPERIMENTAL
 	select CRC_ITU_T
 	help
-	  IEEE 1394 describes a high performance serial bus, which is also
-	  known as FireWire(tm) or i.Link(tm) and is used for connecting all
-	  sorts of devices (most notably digital video cameras) to your
-	  computer.
-
-	  If you have FireWire hardware and want to use it, say Y here.  This
-	  is the core support only, you will also need to select a driver for
-	  your IEEE 1394 adapter.
-
-	  To compile this driver as a module, say M here: the module will be
-	  called firewire-core.
-
-	  This is the "JUJU" FireWire stack, an alternative implementation
+	  This is the "Juju" FireWire stack, a new alternative implementation
 	  designed for robustness and simplicity.  You can build either this
 	  stack, or the classic stack (the ieee1394 driver, ohci1394 etc.)
 	  or both.
 
+	  To compile this driver as a module, say M here: the module will be
+	  called firewire-core.  It functionally replaces ieee1394, raw1394,
+	  and video1394.
+
+          ---- NOTE: ----
+
+	  You should only build ONE of the stacks, unless you REALLY know what
+	  you are doing.  If you install both, you should configure them only as
+	  modules rather than link them statically, and you should at least
+	  blacklist one of the concurrent low-level drivers in
+	  /etc/modprobe.conf.  Add either
+
+	      blacklist firewire-ohci
+	  or
+	      blacklist ohci1394
+
+	  there depending on which driver you DON'T want to have auto-loaded.
+	  You can optionally do the same with the other IEEE 1394/ FireWire
+	  drivers.
+
+	  If you have an old modprobe which doesn't implement the blacklist
+	  directive, use either
+
+	       install firewire-ohci /bin/true
+	  or
+	       install ohci1394 /bin/true
+
+	  and so on, depending on which modules you DON't want to have
+	  auto-loaded.
+
 config FIREWIRE_OHCI
 	tristate "Support for OHCI FireWire host controllers"
 	depends on PCI && FIREWIRE
@@ -34,11 +52,13 @@ config FIREWIRE_OHCI
 	  is the only chipset in use, so say Y here.
 
 	  To compile this driver as a module, say M here:  The module will be
-	  called firewire-ohci.
+	  called firewire-ohci.  It replaces ohci1394 of the classic IEEE 1394
+	  stack.
 
-	  If you also build ohci1394 of the classic IEEE 1394 driver stack,
-	  blacklist either ohci1394 or firewire-ohci to let hotplug load the
-	  desired driver.
+          ---- NOTE: ----
+
+	  If you also build ohci1394 of the classic stack, blacklist either
+	  ohci1394 or firewire-ohci to let hotplug load the desired driver.
 
 config FIREWIRE_SBP2
 	tristate "Support for storage devices (SBP-2 protocol driver)"
@@ -50,12 +70,14 @@ config FIREWIRE_SBP2
 	  like scanners.
 
 	  To compile this driver as a module, say M here:  The module will be
-	  called firewire-sbp2.
+	  called firewire-sbp2.  It replaces sbp2 of the classic IEEE 1394
+	  stack.
 
 	  You should also enable support for disks, CD-ROMs, etc. in the SCSI
 	  configuration section.
 
-	  If you also build sbp2 of the classic IEEE 1394 driver stack,
-	  blacklist either sbp2 or firewire-sbp2 to let hotplug load the
-	  desired driver.
+          ---- NOTE: ----
+
+	  If you also build sbp2 of the classic stack, blacklist either sbp2
+	  or firewire-sbp2 to let hotplug load the desired driver.
 

-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -==- ==--=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* call request_irq before or after hardware initialization?
  2007-06-25 20:18 [RFC patch] firewire: add Kconfig help on building both stacks Stefan Richter
@ 2007-06-29 19:35 ` Li Juen Hwang
  2007-06-29 20:23   ` Arjan van de Ven
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Li Juen Hwang @ 2007-06-29 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux1394-devel, linux-kernel



Hi,

    Most 1394 drivers on Linux, ohci1394 for instance, calls 
request_irq() before
    initializing/enabling hardware chip. I'd like to reverse the order 
so that driver
    can exit the kernel without calling free_irq() if hardware failed. 
Is that ok?
    will it cause side effect? Thanks.


    Li-Juen
   

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: call request_irq before or after hardware initialization?
  2007-06-29 19:35 ` call request_irq before or after hardware initialization? Li Juen Hwang
@ 2007-06-29 20:23   ` Arjan van de Ven
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2007-06-29 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Li Juen Hwang; +Cc: linux1394-devel, linux-kernel

On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 12:35 -0700, Li Juen Hwang wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>     Most 1394 drivers on Linux, ohci1394 for instance, calls 
> request_irq() before
>     initializing/enabling hardware chip. I'd like to reverse the order 
> so that driver
>     can exit the kernel without calling free_irq() if hardware failed. 
> Is that ok?
>     will it cause side effect? Thanks.

well you have to be able to handle interrupts the moment the hardware
will generate them... so the request_irq has to happen before that
point.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-29 20:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-25 20:18 [RFC patch] firewire: add Kconfig help on building both stacks Stefan Richter
2007-06-29 19:35 ` call request_irq before or after hardware initialization? Li Juen Hwang
2007-06-29 20:23   ` Arjan van de Ven

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.