All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Holger Eitzenberger <heitzenberger@astaro.com>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist
	<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add TCP protocol state event groups
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:36:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46891B65.7090407@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4688C826.4020404@astaro.com>

Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>> I can see that this is useful, but one group per protocol state
>> sounds rather excessive, I would expect that we could group them
>> more logically, maybe "connection setup, teardown and updates"?
>> Which states is conntrackd particulary interested in?
> 
> 
>> I would also like to hear from Holger whether his conntrack daemon
>> could make use of a mechnism like this too and if the filtering
>> capabilities you propose will do.
> 
> 
> ctsyncd currently does quite some per-protocol filtering, e.g. TCP
> connections currently get synced only after being in the ESTABLISHED
> state and deleted on the slave side if the teardown event is received.
> This greatly reduces the number of events which are send to the ctsyncd
> peer.
> 
> Although ctsyncd does not have a performance problem at all even if I
> run it against our Spirent performance system I generally like the idea
> of doing some of the filtering in kernelspace.  Though I would leave the
> userspace filtering code as a fallback solution in place.


I agree that kernel space filtering is useful, I'm just not convinced
of this particular approach. I would much rather like to see something
that is not specific to nf_conntrack_netlink and can be specified per
socket, something like bpf for netlink.

> As of July I have a new colleague which hopefully takes over some of the
> workloads I currently have.  My plan therefore for ctsyncd is to finally
> improve filtering capability of ctsyncd and make if configurable, as
> currently most of the filtering code is still hardcoded.  My plan is
> also to improve the partnership with keepalived et all, basically making
> this part more configurable too.  This version will then be my 1.0
> release, as it currently runs fine for serveral months now on our ASG
> products.
> 
> So hopefully I am able to release ctsyncd 1.0 into the public within the
> next few weeks, especially with Netfilter Workshop in mind.


Great.

      reply	other threads:[~2007-07-02 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-11 18:05 [PATCH] add TCP protocol state event groups Pablo Neira Ayuso
2007-06-19 13:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-19 14:13   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2007-06-19 14:44     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-20 17:17       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2007-06-20 17:40         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-21 15:47           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2007-06-21 16:04             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-21 19:11               ` states worth to replicate [was Re: [PATCH] add TCP protocol state event groups] Pablo Neira Ayuso
2007-06-22 12:49                 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-02  9:40   ` [PATCH] add TCP protocol state event groups Holger Eitzenberger
2007-07-02 15:36     ` Patrick McHardy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46891B65.7090407@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=heitzenberger@astaro.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.