All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:19:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4697EC49.4070303@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070711205556.GA27266@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> wrote:
> 
>>> I've taken mainline git tree (freshly integrated CFS!) out for a 
>>> multimedia spin.  I tested watching movies and listenign to music in 
>>> the presence of various sleep/burn loads, pure burn loads, and mixed 
>>> loads. All was peachy here.. I saw no frame drops or sound skips or 
>>> other artifacts under any load where the processor could possibly 
>>> meet demand.
>> I would agree with preliminary testing, save that if you get a lot of 
>> processes updating the screen at once, there seems to be a notable 
>> case of processes getting no CPU for 100-300ms, followed by a lot of 
>> CPU.
>>
>> I see this clearly with the "glitch1" test with four scrolling xterms 
>> and glxgears, but also watching videos with little busy processes on 
>> the screen. The only version where I never see this in test or with 
>> real use is cfs-v13.
> 
> just as a test, does this go away if you:
> 
> 	renice -20 pidof `Xorg`
> 
> i.e. is this connected to the way X is scheduled?
> 
Doing this slows down the display rates, but doesn't significantly help 
the smoothness of the gears.

> Another thing to check would be whether it goes away if you set the 
> granularity to some really finegrained value:
> 
>     echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_wakeup_granularity_ns
>     echo 500000 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity_ns
> 
> this really pushes things - but it tests the theory whether this is 
> related to granularity.
> 
I didn't test this with standard Xorg priority, I should go back and try 
that. But it didn't really make much difference. The gears and scrolling 
xterms ran slower with Xorg at -20 with any sched settings. I'll do that 
as soon as a build finishes and I can reboot.

I should really go back to 2.6.21.6, 2.6.22 has many bizarre behaviors 
with FC6. Automount starts taking 30% of CPU (unused at the moment), the 
sensors applet doesn't work, etc. I hope over the weekend I can get bug 
reports out on all this, but there are lots of non-critical oddities.
> 	Ingo


-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-07-13 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-06 17:33 [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19 Ingo Molnar
2007-07-08 17:46 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-07-09 22:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 21:44     ` Willy Tarreau
2007-07-10  8:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-11 17:26   ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-11 20:55     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-12 12:41       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-13 21:19       ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2007-07-16 21:34         ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-07-16 21:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17  4:22             ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-17  5:01             ` Ian Kent
2007-07-17  7:45               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 11:17                 ` Ian Kent
2007-07-17 17:16                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18  1:24                     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-18  6:19                       ` Ian Kent
2007-07-17 16:30                 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-07-17 21:16                 ` David Schwartz
2007-07-18  5:59                   ` Ian Kent
2007-07-18  7:54                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 13:50                       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-18 17:23                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-18 16:03                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-18 17:31                   ` Ian Kent
2007-07-18 21:37                   ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19  8:53                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 14:32                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:06                       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19 17:10                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:17                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:26                         ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19 17:42                           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-20  2:32                       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19  8:16                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-14 11:34 ` Markus
2007-07-14 15:11   ` Markus
2007-07-16  9:41     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 17:59       ` Markus
2007-07-17  7:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 13:06           ` Markus
2007-07-17 17:06             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 17:13               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 19:42               ` Markus
2007-07-17 20:09                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 20:37                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17 20:43                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 22:03                       ` Markus
2007-07-20 22:26                       ` Markus
2007-07-22 11:59                         ` konqueror suddenly vanishing, "konqueror: Fatal IO error: client killed" Ingo Molnar
2007-07-22 14:26                           ` Markus
2007-08-09 17:34                       ` [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19 Markus
2007-08-10  7:46                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-14 17:15                           ` Markus
2007-10-17  0:02                       ` Markus
2007-07-14 17:19 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-07-15  5:25   ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-15 12:53     ` Markus
2007-07-15 19:46       ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-15 21:11         ` Markus
2007-07-16  6:42           ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-16  8:00     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16  9:17   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 11:10     ` Ed Tomlinson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-08 20:51 Al Boldi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4697EC49.4070303@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.