From: William Montgomery <william@opinicus.com>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e100 PCI bridge problem
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:54:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46981EBE.9080105@opinicus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4697FFA9.7020803@intel.com>
Kok, Auke wrote:
> William Montgomery wrote:
>
>> Thanks for responding. I am very interested to find the source of
>> this problem.
>>
>> Kok, Auke wrote:
>>
>>> William Montgomery wrote:
>>>
>>>> In an earlier post to the list I described a hard lockup condition
>>>> that occurs on linux kernels 2.4.22, 2.6.13, and 2.6.17 when using
>>>> a 4 port 10/100 fast ethernet card. The lockup is easily repeatable
>>>> and occurs on 2 out of 3 computers.
>>>>
>>>> Further testing has revealed that the lockup can be prevented on all
>>>> computers by making sure the card is installed on the primary PCI bus.
>>>> If the card is installed in a slot on the secondary PCI bus (behind a
>>>> PCI to PCI bridge) the lockup occurs.
>>>
>>>
>>> sounds like int-A/B/C/D routing issues
>>
>>
>> The strange thing is that all the ports on the card work fine for a
>> few minutes, then when some condition (as yet unknown) occurs the
>> system locks up hard. I am currently using a PCI bus analyzer to
>> capture bus activity just prior to the lockup to try and find out
>> what leads up to this condition.
>
>
> are you running any form of irqbalance, either in-kernel (bad) or the
> userspace (better) one?
No. This is a Pentium 4 - single core, 2.8GHz.
>
>>>> Are there any PCI tuning registers that I can tweak to get around
>>>> this problem? Any changes I could make to the e100 driver to fix
>>>> this?
>>>
>>>
>>> this issue might be resolvable by quirking the bridgee chips and
>>> adjusting any APIC where needed. Unfortunately I don't know much
>>> about this but it's physically not possible from the e100 driver.
>>> The special (non-intel) card that has these 4 ports onboard contains
>>> a bridge chip itself which explains the issues. Even a BIOS issue
>>> could be the cause here.
>>
>>
>> I am aware of the bridge chip on the card but not sure what you mean
>> when you say this explains the issues? I sure would like to figure
>> out a way around this.
>
>
> irq routing in linux may not be the same as in windows. I have no idea
> how to compare them either (dmesg will show the linux setup, but I
> don't know how to retreive this info under linux).
Not sure how windows applies here; I only use Linux. The main data
point so far is that the card works fine when on the primary PCI bus but
locks up hard after a few minutes when installed in a slot behind a PCI
to PCI bridge. I can provide the dmesg info on Monday.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-14 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-13 17:37 e100 PCI bridge problem William Montgomery
2007-07-13 20:36 ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-13 22:30 ` William Montgomery
2007-07-13 22:41 ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-14 0:54 ` William Montgomery [this message]
2007-07-14 14:43 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-07-14 23:17 ` William Montgomery
2007-07-14 23:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-07-15 1:27 ` William Montgomery
2007-07-17 18:29 ` William Montgomery
2007-07-17 18:55 ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-17 19:37 ` William Montgomery
2007-07-17 21:04 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-07-17 20:54 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46981EBE.9080105@opinicus.com \
--to=william@opinicus.com \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.