From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: early_cpu_init() and identify_cpu()
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:41:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <469B2F22.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C2C0CDD5.AD4B%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
>I'd rather have a later call (but not that late -- before secondary CPUs
>come up is fine) than re-order start-of-day cpu detection code. At least in
>a first patchset! The MTRR update will still happen before scrolling needs
>to occur for the first time, and I don't see that the code will become
>spaghetti because of it.
Okay, will do it that way then.
>By the way, what makes you think that redrawing the whole screen (presumably
>re-pasting text characters one-by-one) would be faster than scrolling?
>Sounds slower to me, or is this because read-plus-write of UC memory sucks?
Yes, exactly that (really its presumably mostly the data dependency of the
writes on the reads, which in a write-only scenario is so much smaller).
>How much faster is scrolling of WC framebuffer on your test system?
Haven't tested yet, as I haven't made the adjustments to make WC work so far
(finding why it doesn't work was the last thing I did on Friday)... But as I said,
I don't expect much gain from *just* the attribute change, as reads will continue
to be done UC. As I said, I'm considering alternatives...
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-16 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-13 16:16 early_cpu_init() and identify_cpu() Jan Beulich
2007-07-13 16:26 ` Keir Fraser
2007-07-16 6:14 ` Jan Beulich
2007-07-16 6:25 ` Keir Fraser
2007-07-16 6:41 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2007-07-16 6:57 ` Keir Fraser
2007-07-16 7:01 ` Keir Fraser
2007-07-16 7:31 ` Jan Beulich
2007-07-16 7:30 ` Jan Beulich
2007-07-16 9:23 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-17 7:55 ` Keir Fraser
2007-07-17 10:00 ` Jan Beulich
2007-07-17 10:15 ` Keir Fraser
2007-07-17 10:23 ` Keir Fraser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-16 8:18 Jan Beulich
2007-07-17 7:50 ` Keir Fraser
2007-07-17 9:58 ` Jan Beulich
2007-07-17 10:05 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=469B2F22.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.