From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not trigger OOM-killer for high-order allocation failures
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:58:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A621B3.6060902@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070724153531.GA30585@skynet.ie>
Mel Gorman wrote:
> out_of_memory() may be called when an allocation is failing and the direct
> reclaim is not making any progress. This does not take into account the
> requested order of the allocation. If the request if for an order larger
> than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, it is reasonable to fail the allocation
> because the kernel makes no guarantees about those allocations succeeding.
>
> This false OOM situation can occur if a user is trying to grow the hugepage
> pool in a script like;
>
> #!/bin/bash
> REQUIRED=$1
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/hugepages_treat_as_movable
> echo $REQUIRED > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
> ACTUAL=`cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages`
> while [ $REQUIRED -ne $ACTUAL ]; do
> echo Huge page pool at $ACTUAL growing to $REQUIRED
> echo $REQUIRED > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
> ACTUAL=`cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages`
> sleep 1
> done
>
> This is a reasonable scenario when ZONE_MOVABLE is in use but triggers OOM
> easily on 2.6.23-rc1. This patch will fail an allocation for an order above
> PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER instead of killing processes and retrying.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
We have had this problem for a long time. When allocating large pages
we could find ourselves unable to allocate such a page nor reclaim one
for ourselves. At this point we will OOM with little hope of that
actually changing the situation for the better.
As you say PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER pretty much defines the orders at
which any sort of guarantee of success is provided. It seems preferable
to fail a allocations above this order/ than killing things to try and
make it available. As higher order users already have to handle failure
to allocate they should be best equipped to continue.
Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
> ---
> page_alloc.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 40954fb..da57173 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1350,6 +1350,10 @@ nofail_alloc:
> if (page)
> goto got_pg;
>
> + /* The OOM killer will not help higher order allocs so fail */
> + if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
> + goto nopage;
> +
> out_of_memory(zonelist, gfp_mask, order);
> goto restart;
> }
-apw
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not trigger OOM-killer for high-order allocation failures
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:58:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A621B3.6060902@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070724153531.GA30585@skynet.ie>
Mel Gorman wrote:
> out_of_memory() may be called when an allocation is failing and the direct
> reclaim is not making any progress. This does not take into account the
> requested order of the allocation. If the request if for an order larger
> than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, it is reasonable to fail the allocation
> because the kernel makes no guarantees about those allocations succeeding.
>
> This false OOM situation can occur if a user is trying to grow the hugepage
> pool in a script like;
>
> #!/bin/bash
> REQUIRED=$1
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/hugepages_treat_as_movable
> echo $REQUIRED > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
> ACTUAL=`cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages`
> while [ $REQUIRED -ne $ACTUAL ]; do
> echo Huge page pool at $ACTUAL growing to $REQUIRED
> echo $REQUIRED > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
> ACTUAL=`cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages`
> sleep 1
> done
>
> This is a reasonable scenario when ZONE_MOVABLE is in use but triggers OOM
> easily on 2.6.23-rc1. This patch will fail an allocation for an order above
> PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER instead of killing processes and retrying.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
We have had this problem for a long time. When allocating large pages
we could find ourselves unable to allocate such a page nor reclaim one
for ourselves. At this point we will OOM with little hope of that
actually changing the situation for the better.
As you say PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER pretty much defines the orders at
which any sort of guarantee of success is provided. It seems preferable
to fail a allocations above this order/ than killing things to try and
make it available. As higher order users already have to handle failure
to allocate they should be best equipped to continue.
Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
> ---
> page_alloc.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 40954fb..da57173 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1350,6 +1350,10 @@ nofail_alloc:
> if (page)
> goto got_pg;
>
> + /* The OOM killer will not help higher order allocs so fail */
> + if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
> + goto nopage;
> +
> out_of_memory(zonelist, gfp_mask, order);
> goto restart;
> }
-apw
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-24 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-24 15:35 [PATCH] Do not trigger OOM-killer for high-order allocation failures Mel Gorman
2007-07-24 15:35 ` Mel Gorman
2007-07-24 15:58 ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2007-07-24 15:58 ` Andy Whitcroft
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A621B3.6060902@shadowen.org \
--to=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@skynet.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.