* Problems with Kernel 2.6.22.1
@ 2007-07-25 7:34 "Thomas B. Preußer"
2007-07-25 15:35 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: "Thomas B. Preußer" @ 2007-07-25 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
having updated my kernel from 2.6.19.2 to 2.6.22.1 both taken as vanilla
source from kernel.org, I now receive errors when trying to insert rules
using the state or conntrack modules. I expect other extensions to fail
as well. The produced error messages suggest some incompatibility
between the kernel and the userspace iptables:
# iptables -v -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
ACCEPT all opt -- in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 state
RELATED,ESTABLISHED
iptables: Invalid argument
# iptables -v -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT -m conntrack --ctstate
RELATED,ESTABLISHED
ACCEPT all opt -- in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 ctstate
RELATED,ESTABLISHED
iptables: Invalid argument
This problem occurs with both the iptables v1.3.6 coming with Debian and
a self-compiled iptables v1.3.8 from the netfilter.org download page.
Is any such issue known? May there be any non-automatic dependencies in
the kernel configuration going beyond:
CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK=y
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ENABLED=y
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNTRACK=y
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_STATE=y
Thanks,
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGpvz/0Kh0pbgr4w8RAnf+AJwJBl7c1IggMMi0SotiqOpJg5c62QCfThRM
M6sXBxEVroOKyQPUAvxx1VM=
=0lyq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Problems with Kernel 2.6.22.1
2007-07-25 7:34 Problems with Kernel 2.6.22.1 "Thomas B. Preußer"
@ 2007-07-25 15:35 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2007-07-25 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: "Thomas B. Preußer"
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist, netfilter
Thomas B. Preußer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> having updated my kernel from 2.6.19.2 to 2.6.22.1 both taken as vanilla
> source from kernel.org, I now receive errors when trying to insert rules
> using the state or conntrack modules. I expect other extensions to fail
> as well. The produced error messages suggest some incompatibility
> between the kernel and the userspace iptables:
>
> # iptables -v -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> ACCEPT all opt -- in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 state
> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> iptables: Invalid argument
>
> # iptables -v -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT -m conntrack --ctstate
> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> ACCEPT all opt -- in * out * 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0.0.0.0/0 ctstate
> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> iptables: Invalid argument
>
> This problem occurs with both the iptables v1.3.6 coming with Debian and
> a self-compiled iptables v1.3.8 from the netfilter.org download page.
>
> Is any such issue known? May there be any non-automatic dependencies in
> the kernel configuration going beyond:
>
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK=y
> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ENABLED=y
> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNTRACK=y
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_STATE=y
Do you also have CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4 enabled?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-25 15:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-25 7:34 Problems with Kernel 2.6.22.1 "Thomas B. Preußer"
2007-07-25 15:35 ` Patrick McHardy
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.