All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Yoann Padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dev->priv to netdev_priv(dev), drivers/net/tokenring/
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:03:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46AE43F5.8070802@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r6mzmf6q.fsf@wanadoo.fr>

Yoann Padioleau wrote:
> Replacing accesses to dev->priv to netdev_priv(dev). The replacment
> is safe when netdev_priv is used to access a private structure that is
> right next to the net_device structure in memory. 
> Cf http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/de19321bcd94dbb8/0d74a4adcd6177bd
> This is the case when the net_device structure was allocated with
> a call to alloc_netdev or one of its derivative.
> 
> Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch that performs the transformation
> 
> @ rule1 @
> type T;
> struct net_device *dev;
> @@
> 
>  dev = 
> (
>         alloc_netdev
> | 
>         alloc_etherdev
> |
>         alloc_trdev
> )
>    (sizeof(T), ...)
> 
> @ rule1bis @
> struct net_device *dev;
> expression E;
> @@
>  dev->priv = E
> 
> @ rule2 depends on rule1 && !rule1bis  @
> struct net_device *dev;
> type rule1.T;
> @@
> 
> - (T*) dev->priv
> + netdev_priv(dev)
> 
> 
> PS: I have performed the same transformation on the whole kernel
> and it affects around 70 files, most of them in drivers/net/.
> Should I split my patch for each subnet directories ? (wireless/, wan/, etc)

applied.  splitting up by sub-directory would be helpful.



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Yoann Padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dev->priv to netdev_priv(dev), drivers/net/tokenring/
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:03:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46AE43F5.8070802@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r6mzmf6q.fsf@wanadoo.fr>

Yoann Padioleau wrote:
> Replacing accesses to dev->priv to netdev_priv(dev). The replacment
> is safe when netdev_priv is used to access a private structure that is
> right next to the net_device structure in memory. 
> Cf http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/de19321bcd94dbb8/0d74a4adcd6177bd
> This is the case when the net_device structure was allocated with
> a call to alloc_netdev or one of its derivative.
> 
> Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch that performs the transformation
> 
> @ rule1 @
> type T;
> struct net_device *dev;
> @@
> 
>  dev = 
> (
>         alloc_netdev
> | 
>         alloc_etherdev
> |
>         alloc_trdev
> )
>    (sizeof(T), ...)
> 
> @ rule1bis @
> struct net_device *dev;
> expression E;
> @@
>  dev->priv = E
> 
> @ rule2 depends on rule1 && !rule1bis  @
> struct net_device *dev;
> type rule1.T;
> @@
> 
> - (T*) dev->priv
> + netdev_priv(dev)
> 
> 
> PS: I have performed the same transformation on the whole kernel
> and it affects around 70 files, most of them in drivers/net/.
> Should I split my patch for each subnet directories ? (wireless/, wan/, etc)

applied.  splitting up by sub-directory would be helpful.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-07-30 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-23 13:18 [PATCH] dev->priv to netdev_priv(dev), drivers/net/tokenring/ Yoann Padioleau
2007-07-23 13:18 ` Yoann Padioleau
2007-07-23 15:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-23 15:13   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-23 15:38   ` Yoann Padioleau
2007-07-23 15:38     ` Yoann Padioleau
2007-07-30 20:03 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-07-30 20:03   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-03 18:03   ` dev->priv to netdev_priv(dev) Yoann Padioleau
2007-08-03 18:03     ` Yoann Padioleau
2007-08-03 23:42     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-08-03 23:42       ` Krzysztof Halasa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46AE43F5.8070802@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=padator@wanadoo.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.