* Question re: mem= usage and resultant vmcore
@ 2007-08-01 16:29 Dave Anderson
2007-08-02 4:46 ` Vivek Goyal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Anderson @ 2007-08-01 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kexec
On an 4GB x86_64 kernel, with memory restricted with "mem=" like so:
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-36.el5 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
console=ttyS0,115200 mem=2000m crashkernel=128M@16M
The secondary kernel boots fine with this:
Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 console=ttyS0,115200
mem=2000m irqpoll maxcpus=1 memmap=exactmap memmap=640K@0K
memmap=5048K@16384K memmap=125368K@22072K elfcorehdr=147440K
memmap=76K#3406720K memmap=564K#3406796K
The /proc/vmcore shows 4GB:
# ls -l /proc/vmcore
-r-------- 1 root root 4164192032 Aug 1 10:57 /proc/vmcore
#
I'm not sure whether that's supposed to reflect the "mem=2000m" size
or not?
Anyway, when copied to /var/crash, the "cp" command in the kdump init
file returns a 1, and the vmcore file is kept named as "vmcore-incomplete".
But the vmcore-incomplete looks to be the "right" size, and is functional
as a vmcore file:
# crash /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/2.6.18-36.el5/vmlinux vmcore-incomplete
crash 4.0-4.3.1
Copyright (C) 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Red Hat, Inc.
Copyright (C) 2004, 2005, 2006 IBM Corporation
Copyright (C) 1999-2006 Hewlett-Packard Co
Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 Fujitsu Limited
Copyright (C) 2006, 2007 VA Linux Systems Japan K.K.
Copyright (C) 2005 NEC Corporation
Copyright (C) 1999, 2002 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Mission Critical Linux, Inc.
This program is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License,
and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under
certain conditions. Enter "help copying" to see the conditions.
This program has absolutely no warranty. Enter "help warranty" for details.
GNU gdb 6.1
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"...
KERNEL: /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/2.6.18-36.el5/vmlinux
DUMPFILE: vmcore-incomplete
CPUS: 4
DATE: Wed Aug 1 11:47:13 2007
UPTIME: 00:02:15
LOAD AVERAGE: 0.16, 0.14, 0.06
TASKS: 118
NODENAME: nec-em17.rhts.boston.redhat.com
RELEASE: 2.6.18-36.el5
VERSION: #1 SMP Fri Jul 20 14:26:46 EDT 2007
MACHINE: x86_64 (2992 Mhz)
MEMORY: 1.9 GB
PANIC: "SysRq : Trigger a crashdump"
PID: 3044
COMMAND: "bash"
TASK: ffff8100794f0100 [THREAD_INFO: ffff8100656dc000]
CPU: 0
STATE: TASK_RUNNING (SYSRQ)
crash>
So two questions -- should the /proc/vmcore on the secondary kernel
reflect the restricted size, and what would cause the "cp" to
only copy the "correct" amount, while returning an error code?
Dave
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Question re: mem= usage and resultant vmcore
@ 2007-08-01 18:03 Dave Anderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Anderson @ 2007-08-01 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kexec
> The /proc/vmcore shows 4GB:
>
> # ls -l /proc/vmcore
> -r-------- 1 root root 4164192032 Aug 1 10:57 /proc/vmcore
> #
I forgot to mention that the resultant, usable, vmcore-incomplete
files are consistently the same size, reflecting the mem=2000m
kernel option:
# ls -l
total 435020
-r-------- 1 root root 1967558656 Aug 1 11:47 vmcore-incomplete
#
So, is this a bug or a feature?
Dave
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question re: mem= usage and resultant vmcore
2007-08-01 16:29 Dave Anderson
@ 2007-08-02 4:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-08-02 13:42 ` Dave Anderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vivek Goyal @ 2007-08-02 4:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Anderson; +Cc: kexec
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:29:59PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
> On an 4GB x86_64 kernel, with memory restricted with "mem=" like so:
>
> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-36.el5 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
> console=ttyS0,115200 mem=2000m crashkernel=128M@16M
>
> The secondary kernel boots fine with this:
>
> Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 console=ttyS0,115200
> mem=2000m irqpoll maxcpus=1 memmap=exactmap memmap=640K@0K
> memmap=5048K@16384K memmap=125368K@22072K elfcorehdr=147440K
> memmap=76K#3406720K memmap=564K#3406796K
>
> The /proc/vmcore shows 4GB:
>
> # ls -l /proc/vmcore
> -r-------- 1 root root 4164192032 Aug 1 10:57 /proc/vmcore
> #
>
> I'm not sure whether that's supposed to reflect the "mem=2000m" size
> or not?
>
Hi Dave,
/proc/iomem on i386 and x86_64 behave differently when passed with mem=
parameter. I think on i386, only memory specified by mem= is visible but
in case of x86_64, all the memory passed by BIOS to kernel is visible.
Kexec/kdump retrieve the physical memory info from /proc/iomem. We need
both the behaviours for two scenarios.
- For kexec, we want to see whole of the memory (irrespective of the fact
how much current kernel is using), so that next kernel can potentially
use all the memory to boot in.
- For kdump, we want to know about only the physical memory current kernel
is using and not all the memory system has.
Here the issue is that despite the fact you have passed mem=2000m, /proc/iomem
will show 4G physical memory and kdump will create elf header for 4G of
memory. That's why /proc/vmcore size is 4G. I am not sure why it did not
copy whole 4G on disk and stoppped after 2000m. To me it should have copied
whole of the 4G.
Bottom line, we need to do some work in this area.
- Make /proc/iomem behaviour consistent across i386 and x86_64. I think
it can be changed to reflect the physical memory currently used by
kernel (based on mem=) parameter.
- Create another /proc interface, lets say /proc/physmem, which will reflect
all the physical memory system has, irrespective of the fact what is being
used by the kernel.
In this case kexec can make use of /proc/physmem and kdump can make use
of /proc/iomem and things will be fine.
Anybody interested in writing patches for this?
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Question re: mem= usage and resultant vmcore
2007-08-02 4:46 ` Vivek Goyal
@ 2007-08-02 13:42 ` Dave Anderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Anderson @ 2007-08-02 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vgoyal; +Cc: kexec
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:29:59PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
>>On an 4GB x86_64 kernel, with memory restricted with "mem=" like so:
>>
>> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-36.el5 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
>> console=ttyS0,115200 mem=2000m crashkernel=128M@16M
>>
>>The secondary kernel boots fine with this:
>>
>> Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 console=ttyS0,115200
>> mem=2000m irqpoll maxcpus=1 memmap=exactmap memmap=640K@0K
>> memmap=5048K@16384K memmap=125368K@22072K elfcorehdr=147440K
>> memmap=76K#3406720K memmap=564K#3406796K
>>
>>The /proc/vmcore shows 4GB:
>>
>> # ls -l /proc/vmcore
>> -r-------- 1 root root 4164192032 Aug 1 10:57 /proc/vmcore
>> #
>>
>>I'm not sure whether that's supposed to reflect the "mem=2000m" size
>>or not?
>>
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> /proc/iomem on i386 and x86_64 behave differently when passed with mem=
> parameter. I think on i386, only memory specified by mem= is visible but
> in case of x86_64, all the memory passed by BIOS to kernel is visible.
>
> Kexec/kdump retrieve the physical memory info from /proc/iomem. We need
> both the behaviours for two scenarios.
>
> - For kexec, we want to see whole of the memory (irrespective of the fact
> how much current kernel is using), so that next kernel can potentially
> use all the memory to boot in.
>
> - For kdump, we want to know about only the physical memory current kernel
> is using and not all the memory system has.
>
> Here the issue is that despite the fact you have passed mem=2000m, /proc/iomem
> will show 4G physical memory and kdump will create elf header for 4G of
> memory. That's why /proc/vmcore size is 4G. I am not sure why it did not
> copy whole 4G on disk and stoppped after 2000m. To me it should have copied
> whole of the 4G.
Yeah -- I haven't verified it, but I'm guessing that read_vmcore()
fails due to its call to map_offset_to_paddr(), which doesn't
find the physical memory beyond 2000m in the vmcore_list?
Interestingly enough, this may never have been noticed except for
the save_core() function in the /etc/init.d/kdump file in Red Hat's
kexec-tools package:
function save_core()
{
coredir="/var/crash/`date +"%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M"`"
mkdir -p $coredir
cp /proc/vmcore $coredir/vmcore-incomplete
exitcode=$?
if [ $exitcode == 0 ]; then
mv $coredir/vmcore-incomplete $coredir/vmcore
$LOGGER "saved a vmcore to $coredir"
else
$LOGGER "failed to save a vmcore to $coredir"
fi
return $exitcode
}
And even though the ELF header reflects the 4GB memory size,
the vmcore-incomplete file is "complete" w/respect to the
primary kernel. In other words, even though the ELF header
advertises non-existent physical memory beyond the 2000m
limit, there's never a need to access it from the crash utility,
so it's kind of a benign bug.
Dave
>
> Bottom line, we need to do some work in this area.
>
> - Make /proc/iomem behaviour consistent across i386 and x86_64. I think
> it can be changed to reflect the physical memory currently used by
> kernel (based on mem=) parameter.
>
> - Create another /proc interface, lets say /proc/physmem, which will reflect
> all the physical memory system has, irrespective of the fact what is being
> used by the kernel.
>
> In this case kexec can make use of /proc/physmem and kdump can make use
> of /proc/iomem and things will be fine.
>
> Anybody interested in writing patches for this?
>
> Thanks
> Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-02 13:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-01 18:03 Question re: mem= usage and resultant vmcore Dave Anderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-01 16:29 Dave Anderson
2007-08-02 4:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-08-02 13:42 ` Dave Anderson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.