All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree
@ 2007-08-06  1:09 David Miller
  2007-08-06  8:38 ` Andrew Walrond
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2007-08-06  1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sparclinux


I cut a 2.6.24 sparc development tree at:

	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-2.6.24.git

merely because I wanted to dump some framebuffer driver changes
out of my inbox that were not appropriate for 2.6.23

The sparc32 asm-sparc/fcntl.h build fix isn't in there, but it's
easy for those interested to patch it in and it will show up there
next time I rebase.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree
  2007-08-06  1:09 Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree David Miller
@ 2007-08-06  8:38 ` Andrew Walrond
  2007-08-06  9:31 ` David Miller
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Walrond @ 2007-08-06  8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sparclinux

David Miller wrote:
> I cut a 2.6.24 sparc development tree at:
> 
> 	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-2.6.24.git
> 
> merely because I wanted to dump some framebuffer driver changes
> out of my inbox that were not appropriate for 2.6.23
> 

I've been trying to upgrade the 2.6.20 kernel on a T1000 to a vanilla
2.6.22.1 kernel, but have so far failed to build a kernel that will boot
cleanly. (I used make oldconfig on the 2.6.20 .config + lots of minor
variations).

Will I have better luck if I follow one or more of your trees, David?
Which tree is best to follow? Could you give a quick overview of your
trees and how they fit in with upstream (or point me to an FAQ if there
is one).

Or, if 2.6.22.1 should boot fine on a T1000, perhaps someone could mail
me a known good .config that I could use as a base?

Thanks!

Andrew Walrond














^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree
  2007-08-06  1:09 Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree David Miller
  2007-08-06  8:38 ` Andrew Walrond
@ 2007-08-06  9:31 ` David Miller
  2007-08-06  9:32 ` David Miller
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2007-08-06  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sparclinux

From: Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:38:22 +0100

> Or, if 2.6.22.1 should boot fine on a T1000, perhaps someone could mail
> me a known good .config that I could use as a base?

I use arch/sparc64/defconfig, enable CONFIG_FUSION* and CONFIG_SMP,
works fine on all my Niagara boxes.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree
  2007-08-06  1:09 Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree David Miller
  2007-08-06  8:38 ` Andrew Walrond
  2007-08-06  9:31 ` David Miller
@ 2007-08-06  9:32 ` David Miller
  2007-08-06 10:26 ` Andrew Walrond
  2007-08-06 15:46 ` Andrew Walrond
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2007-08-06  9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sparclinux


BTW, please report this kind of failure as soon as you see
it, not 2 releases later which makes it infinitely harder to
track down the cause of the problem.

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree
  2007-08-06  1:09 Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree David Miller
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-08-06  9:32 ` David Miller
@ 2007-08-06 10:26 ` Andrew Walrond
  2007-08-06 15:46 ` Andrew Walrond
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Walrond @ 2007-08-06 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sparclinux

David Miller wrote:
> 
> I use arch/sparc64/defconfig, enable CONFIG_FUSION* and CONFIG_SMP,
> works fine on all my Niagara boxes.

Do these warnings matter?

 v2.6.22.1 $ make image
  CHK     include/linux/version.h
  CHK     include/linux/utsrelease.h
  CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
  CHK     include/linux/compile.h
  MODPOST vmlinux
WARNING: arch/sparc64/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x1bdf0): Section
mismatch: reference to .init.text:sun4v_init_mondo_queues (between
'after_lock_tlb' and 'sparc64_cpu_startup_end')
WARNING: arch/sparc64/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x1beac): Section
mismatch: reference to .init.text:smp_callin (between 'after_lock_tlb'
and 'sparc64_cpu_startup_end')
  STRIP   arch/sparc64/boot/image
  kernel: arch/sparc64/boot/image is ready



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree
  2007-08-06  1:09 Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree David Miller
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-08-06 10:26 ` Andrew Walrond
@ 2007-08-06 15:46 ` Andrew Walrond
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Walrond @ 2007-08-06 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sparclinux

David Miller wrote:
> 
> I use arch/sparc64/defconfig, enable CONFIG_FUSION* and CONFIG_SMP,
> works fine on all my Niagara boxes.
> -

What compiler version do you use?

I've got a horrible feeling I've just spent a day fighting against a
miscompilation by gcc-4.2.

Perhaps this is a known problem? I'm rebuilding with gcc-4.1.2 now and
will report back shortly....

Andrew Walrond

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-06 15:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-06  1:09 Sparc-2.6.24 GIT tree David Miller
2007-08-06  8:38 ` Andrew Walrond
2007-08-06  9:31 ` David Miller
2007-08-06  9:32 ` David Miller
2007-08-06 10:26 ` Andrew Walrond
2007-08-06 15:46 ` Andrew Walrond

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.