* [PATCH 2/3] reiserfs: ignore s_bmap_nr on disk for file systems >= 8 TiB
@ 2007-08-07 15:28 Jeff Mahoney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Mahoney @ 2007-08-07 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ReiserFS Mailing List; +Cc: Vladimir V. Saveliev
The reiserfs disk format is designed to handle file systems up to
2^32-1 blocks, which at 4KiB blocks means ~ 16 TiB - 4KiB.
Unfortunately, the superblock's s_bmap_nr value, which contains a
count of the number of bitmap blocks in the file system is a 16 bit
value. This limits the usable size of the file system to
8 TiB (4096^2 * 8 * 65536).
Changing the disk format this late in the game, especially with a file
system without sane superblock versioning, is a tough sell. This patch
implements the following changes:
* The s_bmap_nr value is no longer accessed directly. Instead, an
in-core 32-bit value is used instead. The real value is only
accessed directly during mount and resize.
* If the value of s_bmap_nr is valid, then the value is used as-is.
* If the value of s_bmap_nr has overflowed, the on-disk value is
zeroed out and the number of bitmaps is calculate on mount and
resize.
The reason for zeroing it out is simple. If it has overflowed, it's
invalid anyway. Kernels mounting these file systems may end up
with unpredictible results, the most obvious of which occurs in
kernels with dynamic bitmaps: it will BUG almost immediately.
Alternatively, if the value is zeroed, the memory allocation for
tracking the bitmap blocks will end up being vmalloc(0), causing
mount to fail when a NULL pointer is returned. Since the
ZERO_SIZE_PTR changes haven't been merged in these older kernels,
the failure won't result in an Oops, just a failed mount.
A matching change for reiserfsprogs will also be submitted to support
the s_bmap_nr == 0 value as valid.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
---
fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
fs/reiserfs/journal.c | 6 ++---
fs/reiserfs/resize.c | 9 ++++++--
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h | 3 ++
include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h | 1
5 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c 2007-08-07 11:07:22.000000000 -0400
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c 2007-08-07 11:07:29.000000000 -0400
@@ -77,25 +77,26 @@ int is_reusable(struct super_block *s, b
if (unlikely(test_bit(REISERFS_OLD_FORMAT,
&(REISERFS_SB(s)->s_properties)))) {
b_blocknr_t bmap1 = REISERFS_SB(s)->s_sbh->b_blocknr + 1;
- if (block >= bmap1 && block <= bmap1 + SB_BMAP_NR(s)) {
+ if (block >= bmap1 &&
+ block <= bmap1 + REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr) {
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs: 4019: is_reusable: "
"bitmap block %lu(%u) can't be freed or reused",
- block, SB_BMAP_NR(s));
+ block, REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr);
return 0;
}
} else {
if (offset == 0) {
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs: 4020: is_reusable: "
"bitmap block %lu(%u) can't be freed or reused",
- block, SB_BMAP_NR(s));
+ block, REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr);
return 0;
}
}
- if (bmap >= SB_BMAP_NR(s)) {
+ if (bmap >= REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr) {
reiserfs_warning(s,
"vs-4030: is_reusable: there is no so many bitmap blocks: "
- "block=%lu, bitmap_nr=%d", block, bmap);
+ "block=%lu, bitmap_nr=%u", block, bmap);
return 0;
}
@@ -145,8 +146,8 @@ static int scan_bitmap_block(struct reis
BUG_ON(!th->t_trans_id);
- RFALSE(bmap_n >= SB_BMAP_NR(s), "Bitmap %d is out of range (0..%d)",
- bmap_n, SB_BMAP_NR(s) - 1);
+ RFALSE(bmap_n >= REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr, "Bitmap %u is out of range (0..%u)",
+ bmap_n, REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr - 1);
PROC_INFO_INC(s, scan_bitmap.bmap);
/* this is unclear and lacks comments, explain how journal bitmaps
work here for the reader. Convey a sense of the design here. What
@@ -251,12 +252,12 @@ static int bmap_hash_id(struct super_blo
} else {
hash_in = (char *)(&id);
hash = keyed_hash(hash_in, 4);
- bm = hash % SB_BMAP_NR(s);
+ bm = hash % REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr;
if (!bm)
bm = 1;
}
/* this can only be true when SB_BMAP_NR = 1 */
- if (bm >= SB_BMAP_NR(s))
+ if (bm >= REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr)
bm = 0;
return bm;
}
@@ -330,10 +331,10 @@ static int scan_bitmap(struct reiserfs_t
get_bit_address(s, *start, &bm, &off);
get_bit_address(s, finish, &end_bm, &end_off);
- if (bm > SB_BMAP_NR(s))
+ if (bm > REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr)
return 0;
- if (end_bm > SB_BMAP_NR(s))
- end_bm = SB_BMAP_NR(s);
+ if (end_bm > REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr)
+ end_bm = REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr;
/* When the bitmap is more than 10% free, anyone can allocate.
* When it's less than 10% free, only files that already use the
@@ -399,10 +400,12 @@ static void _reiserfs_free_block(struct
get_bit_address(s, block, &nr, &offset);
- if (nr >= sb_bmap_nr(rs)) {
+ if (nr >= REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr) {
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4075: reiserfs_free_block: "
- "block %lu is out of range on %s",
- block, reiserfs_bdevname(s));
+ "block %lu is out of range on %s "
+ "(nr=%u,max=%u)", block,
+ reiserfs_bdevname(s), nr,
+ REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr);
return;
}
@@ -1326,14 +1329,21 @@ struct buffer_head *reiserfs_read_bitmap
int reiserfs_init_bitmap_cache(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct reiserfs_bitmap_info *bitmap;
+ unsigned int blocks = SB_BLOCK_COUNT(sb);
+ unsigned int bmap_nr = blocks >> (sb->s_blocksize_bits + 3);
- bitmap = vmalloc(sizeof (*bitmap) * SB_BMAP_NR(sb));
+ if (blocks & ~(sb->s_blocksize << 3))
+ ++bmap_nr;
+
+
+ bitmap = vmalloc(sizeof (*bitmap) * bmap_nr);
if (bitmap == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
- memset(bitmap, 0, sizeof (*bitmap) * SB_BMAP_NR(sb));
+ memset(bitmap, 0, sizeof (*bitmap) * bmap_nr);
SB_AP_BITMAP(sb) = bitmap;
+ REISERFS_SB(sb)->s_bmap_nr = bmap_nr;
return 0;
}
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c 2007-08-07 11:07:22.000000000 -0400
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c 2007-08-07 11:07:29.000000000 -0400
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void cleanup_bitmap_list(struct s
if (jb->bitmaps == NULL)
return;
- for (i = 0; i < SB_BMAP_NR(p_s_sb); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < REISERFS_SB(p_s_sb)->s_bmap_nr; i++) {
if (jb->bitmaps[i]) {
free_bitmap_node(p_s_sb, jb->bitmaps[i]);
jb->bitmaps[i] = NULL;
@@ -2651,7 +2651,7 @@ int journal_init(struct super_block *p_s
journal->j_persistent_trans = 0;
if (reiserfs_allocate_list_bitmaps(p_s_sb,
journal->j_list_bitmap,
- SB_BMAP_NR(p_s_sb)))
+ REISERFS_SB(p_s_sb)->s_bmap_nr))
goto free_and_return;
allocate_bitmap_nodes(p_s_sb);
@@ -2659,7 +2659,7 @@ int journal_init(struct super_block *p_s
SB_JOURNAL_1st_RESERVED_BLOCK(p_s_sb) = (old_format ?
REISERFS_OLD_DISK_OFFSET_IN_BYTES
/ p_s_sb->s_blocksize +
- SB_BMAP_NR(p_s_sb) +
+ REISERFS_SB(p_s_sb)->s_bmap_nr +
1 :
REISERFS_DISK_OFFSET_IN_BYTES /
p_s_sb->s_blocksize + 2);
--- a/fs/reiserfs/resize.c 2007-08-07 11:07:25.000000000 -0400
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/resize.c 2007-08-07 11:07:29.000000000 -0400
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *
}
/* count used bits in last bitmap block */
- block_r = SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s) - (SB_BMAP_NR(s) - 1) * s->s_blocksize * 8;
+ block_r = SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s) - (REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr - 1) * s->s_blocksize * 8;
/* count bitmap blocks in new fs */
bmap_nr_new = block_count_new / (s->s_blocksize * 8);
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *
/* save old values */
block_count = SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s);
- bmap_nr = SB_BMAP_NR(s);
+ bmap_nr = REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr;
/* resizing of reiserfs bitmaps (journal and real), if needed */
if (bmap_nr_new > bmap_nr) {
@@ -206,6 +206,11 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *
free_blocks + (block_count_new - block_count -
(bmap_nr_new - bmap_nr)));
PUT_SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s, block_count_new);
+
+ REISERFS_SB(s)->s_bmap_nr = bmap_nr_new;
+ if (bmap_would_wrap(bmap_nr_new))
+ bmap_nr_new = 0;
+
PUT_SB_BMAP_NR(s, bmap_nr_new);
s->s_dirt = 1;
--- a/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h 2007-08-07 11:07:22.000000000 -0400
+++ b/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h 2007-08-07 11:07:29.000000000 -0400
@@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ struct reiserfs_super_block {
((!is_reiserfs_jr(SB_DISK_SUPER_BLOCK(s)) ? \
SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(s) + 1 : SB_ONDISK_RESERVED_FOR_JOURNAL(s)))
+/* s_bmap_nr is a u16 */
+#define bmap_would_wrap(n) (n >= 65536)
+
int is_reiserfs_3_5(struct reiserfs_super_block *rs);
int is_reiserfs_3_6(struct reiserfs_super_block *rs);
int is_reiserfs_jr(struct reiserfs_super_block *rs);
--- a/include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h 2007-08-07 11:07:14.000000000 -0400
+++ b/include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h 2007-08-07 11:07:29.000000000 -0400
@@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ struct reiserfs_sb_info {
char *s_qf_names[MAXQUOTAS];
int s_jquota_fmt;
#endif
+ unsigned int s_bmap_nr;
};
/* Definitions of reiserfs on-disk properties: */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [patch 0/3] reiserfs: support for file systems > 8 TiB
@ 2007-08-09 1:19 Jeff Mahoney
2007-08-09 1:19 ` [patch 2/3] reiserfs: ignore s_bmap_nr on disk for file systems >= " Jeff Mahoney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Mahoney @ 2007-08-09 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ReiserFS Development Mailing List; +Cc: Vladimir Saveliev
Hi all -
When I was integrating my reiserfsprogs patches into 3.6.20, I realized
that it already understands larger bitmaps. Not only that, it zeroes them
out just as my patches did. Since that revision has been released for
nearly a year, I'd call that "standard."
This set of patches should be the final one. Rather than caching the
bitmap count in the superblock, we calculate it on the fly like
reiserfsprogs does.
I've integrated this patch set into the openSUSE 10.3 kernel, but I'm
confident they'll survive some heavier testing.
-Jeff
--
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [patch 2/3] reiserfs: ignore s_bmap_nr on disk for file systems >= 8 TiB
2007-08-09 1:19 [patch 0/3] reiserfs: support for file systems > " Jeff Mahoney
@ 2007-08-09 1:19 ` Jeff Mahoney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Mahoney @ 2007-08-09 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ReiserFS Development Mailing List; +Cc: Vladimir Saveliev
[-- Attachment #1: reiserfs-fix-large-fs.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 9205 bytes --]
The reiserfs disk format is designed to handle file systems up to
2^32-1 blocks, which at 4KiB blocks means ~ 16 TiB - 4KiB.
Unfortunately, the superblock's s_bmap_nr value, which contains a
count of the number of bitmap blocks in the file system is a 16 bit
value. This limits the usable size of the file system to
8 TiB (4096^2 * 8 * 65536).
This patch implements the changes introduced with reiserfsprogs 3.6.20,
where s_bmap_nr is zeroed out if the value would overflow.
Older implementations will see the zero value of s_bmap_nr and abort
the mount due to a vmalloc(0) before reading the bitmaps. This is safer
than the current behavior which can result in corruption or BUG's.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
---
fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
fs/reiserfs/journal.c | 6 +++---
fs/reiserfs/resize.c | 6 +++---
fs/reiserfs/super.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h | 5 +++++
include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h | 1 +
6 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c 2007-08-08 15:59:01.000000000 -0400
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c 2007-08-08 16:09:59.000000000 -0400
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static inline void get_bit_address(struc
int is_reusable(struct super_block *s, b_blocknr_t block, int bit_value)
{
unsigned int bmap, offset;
+ unsigned int bmap_count = reiserfs_bmap_count(s);
if (block == 0 || block >= SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s)) {
reiserfs_warning(s,
@@ -77,25 +78,26 @@ int is_reusable(struct super_block *s, b
if (unlikely(test_bit(REISERFS_OLD_FORMAT,
&(REISERFS_SB(s)->s_properties)))) {
b_blocknr_t bmap1 = REISERFS_SB(s)->s_sbh->b_blocknr + 1;
- if (block >= bmap1 && block <= bmap1 + SB_BMAP_NR(s)) {
+ if (block >= bmap1 &&
+ block <= bmap1 + bmap_count) {
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs: 4019: is_reusable: "
"bitmap block %lu(%u) can't be freed or reused",
- block, SB_BMAP_NR(s));
+ block, bmap_count);
return 0;
}
} else {
if (offset == 0) {
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs: 4020: is_reusable: "
"bitmap block %lu(%u) can't be freed or reused",
- block, SB_BMAP_NR(s));
+ block, bmap_count);
return 0;
}
}
- if (bmap >= SB_BMAP_NR(s)) {
+ if (bmap >= bmap_count) {
reiserfs_warning(s,
"vs-4030: is_reusable: there is no so many bitmap blocks: "
- "block=%lu, bitmap_nr=%d", block, bmap);
+ "block=%lu, bitmap_nr=%u", block, bmap);
return 0;
}
@@ -145,8 +147,8 @@ static int scan_bitmap_block(struct reis
BUG_ON(!th->t_trans_id);
- RFALSE(bmap_n >= SB_BMAP_NR(s), "Bitmap %d is out of range (0..%d)",
- bmap_n, SB_BMAP_NR(s) - 1);
+ RFALSE(bmap_n >= reiserfs_bmap_count(s), "Bitmap %u is out of "
+ "range (0..%u)", bmap_n, reiserfs_bmap_count(s) - 1);
PROC_INFO_INC(s, scan_bitmap.bmap);
/* this is unclear and lacks comments, explain how journal bitmaps
work here for the reader. Convey a sense of the design here. What
@@ -251,12 +253,12 @@ static int bmap_hash_id(struct super_blo
} else {
hash_in = (char *)(&id);
hash = keyed_hash(hash_in, 4);
- bm = hash % SB_BMAP_NR(s);
+ bm = hash % reiserfs_bmap_count(s);
if (!bm)
bm = 1;
}
/* this can only be true when SB_BMAP_NR = 1 */
- if (bm >= SB_BMAP_NR(s))
+ if (bm >= reiserfs_bmap_count(s))
bm = 0;
return bm;
}
@@ -330,10 +332,10 @@ static int scan_bitmap(struct reiserfs_t
get_bit_address(s, *start, &bm, &off);
get_bit_address(s, finish, &end_bm, &end_off);
- if (bm > SB_BMAP_NR(s))
+ if (bm > reiserfs_bmap_count(s))
return 0;
- if (end_bm > SB_BMAP_NR(s))
- end_bm = SB_BMAP_NR(s);
+ if (end_bm > reiserfs_bmap_count(s))
+ end_bm = reiserfs_bmap_count(s);
/* When the bitmap is more than 10% free, anyone can allocate.
* When it's less than 10% free, only files that already use the
@@ -399,10 +401,12 @@ static void _reiserfs_free_block(struct
get_bit_address(s, block, &nr, &offset);
- if (nr >= sb_bmap_nr(rs)) {
+ if (nr >= reiserfs_bmap_count(s)) {
reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4075: reiserfs_free_block: "
- "block %lu is out of range on %s",
- block, reiserfs_bdevname(s));
+ "block %lu is out of range on %s "
+ "(nr=%u,max=%u)", block,
+ reiserfs_bdevname(s), nr,
+ reiserfs_bmap_count(s));
return;
}
@@ -1326,12 +1330,13 @@ struct buffer_head *reiserfs_read_bitmap
int reiserfs_init_bitmap_cache(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct reiserfs_bitmap_info *bitmap;
+ unsigned int bmap_nr = reiserfs_bmap_count(sb);
- bitmap = vmalloc(sizeof (*bitmap) * SB_BMAP_NR(sb));
+ bitmap = vmalloc(sizeof (*bitmap) * bmap_nr);
if (bitmap == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
- memset(bitmap, 0, sizeof (*bitmap) * SB_BMAP_NR(sb));
+ memset(bitmap, 0, sizeof (*bitmap) * bmap_nr);
SB_AP_BITMAP(sb) = bitmap;
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c 2007-08-08 15:59:01.000000000 -0400
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c 2007-08-08 16:03:29.000000000 -0400
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static void cleanup_bitmap_list(struct s
if (jb->bitmaps == NULL)
return;
- for (i = 0; i < SB_BMAP_NR(p_s_sb); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < reiserfs_bmap_count(p_s_sb); i++) {
if (jb->bitmaps[i]) {
free_bitmap_node(p_s_sb, jb->bitmaps[i]);
jb->bitmaps[i] = NULL;
@@ -2651,7 +2651,7 @@ int journal_init(struct super_block *p_s
journal->j_persistent_trans = 0;
if (reiserfs_allocate_list_bitmaps(p_s_sb,
journal->j_list_bitmap,
- SB_BMAP_NR(p_s_sb)))
+ reiserfs_bmap_count(p_s_sb)))
goto free_and_return;
allocate_bitmap_nodes(p_s_sb);
@@ -2659,7 +2659,7 @@ int journal_init(struct super_block *p_s
SB_JOURNAL_1st_RESERVED_BLOCK(p_s_sb) = (old_format ?
REISERFS_OLD_DISK_OFFSET_IN_BYTES
/ p_s_sb->s_blocksize +
- SB_BMAP_NR(p_s_sb) +
+ reiserfs_bmap_count(p_s_sb) +
1 :
REISERFS_DISK_OFFSET_IN_BYTES /
p_s_sb->s_blocksize + 2);
--- a/fs/reiserfs/resize.c 2007-08-08 15:59:01.000000000 -0400
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/resize.c 2007-08-08 16:04:14.000000000 -0400
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *
}
/* count used bits in last bitmap block */
- block_r = SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s) - (SB_BMAP_NR(s) - 1) * s->s_blocksize * 8;
+ block_r = SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s) - (reiserfs_bmap_count(s) - 1) * s->s_blocksize * 8;
/* count bitmap blocks in new fs */
bmap_nr_new = block_count_new / (s->s_blocksize * 8);
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *
/* save old values */
block_count = SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s);
- bmap_nr = SB_BMAP_NR(s);
+ bmap_nr = reiserfs_bmap_count(s);
/* resizing of reiserfs bitmaps (journal and real), if needed */
if (bmap_nr_new > bmap_nr) {
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ int reiserfs_resize(struct super_block *
free_blocks + (block_count_new - block_count -
(bmap_nr_new - bmap_nr)));
PUT_SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s, block_count_new);
- PUT_SB_BMAP_NR(s, bmap_nr_new);
+ PUT_SB_BMAP_NR(s, bmap_would_wrap(bmap_nr_new) ? : bmap_nr_new );
s->s_dirt = 1;
journal_mark_dirty(&th, s, SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB(s));
--- a/fs/reiserfs/super.c 2007-08-08 15:59:01.000000000 -0400
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/super.c 2007-08-08 16:04:51.000000000 -0400
@@ -1713,6 +1713,21 @@ static int reiserfs_fill_super(struct su
set_sb_umount_state(rs, REISERFS_ERROR_FS);
set_sb_fs_state(rs, 0);
+ /* Clear out s_bmap_nr if it would wrap. We can handle this
+ * case, but older revisions can't. This will cause the
+ * file system to fail mount on those older implementations,
+ * avoiding corruption. -jeffm */
+ if (bmap_would_wrap(reiserfs_bmap_count(s)) &&
+ sb_bmap_nr(rs) != 0) {
+ reiserfs_warning(s, "super-2030: This file system "
+ "claims to use %u bitmap blocks in "
+ "its super block, but requires %u. "
+ "Clearing to zero.", sb_bmap_nr(rs),
+ reiserfs_bmap_count(s));
+
+ set_sb_bmap_nr(rs, 0);
+ }
+
if (old_format_only(s)) {
/* filesystem of format 3.5 either with standard or non-standard
journal */
--- a/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h 2007-08-08 15:59:01.000000000 -0400
+++ b/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h 2007-08-08 16:10:59.000000000 -0400
@@ -229,6 +229,11 @@ struct reiserfs_super_block {
((!is_reiserfs_jr(SB_DISK_SUPER_BLOCK(s)) ? \
SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(s) + 1 : SB_ONDISK_RESERVED_FOR_JOURNAL(s)))
+/* s_bmap_nr is a u16 */
+#define reiserfs_bmap_count(sb) reiserfs_bmap_nr(SB_BLOCK_COUNT(sb), sb->s_blocksize)
+#define reiserfs_bmap_nr(count, blk_size) ((count - 1) / (blk_size * 8) + 1)
+#define bmap_would_wrap(n) (n > ((1LL << 16) - 1))
+
int is_reiserfs_3_5(struct reiserfs_super_block *rs);
int is_reiserfs_3_6(struct reiserfs_super_block *rs);
int is_reiserfs_jr(struct reiserfs_super_block *rs);
--- a/include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h 2007-08-08 15:59:01.000000000 -0400
+++ b/include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h 2007-08-08 15:59:03.000000000 -0400
@@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ struct reiserfs_sb_info {
char *s_qf_names[MAXQUOTAS];
int s_jquota_fmt;
#endif
+ unsigned int s_bmap_nr;
};
/* Definitions of reiserfs on-disk properties: */
--
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-09 1:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-07 15:28 [PATCH 2/3] reiserfs: ignore s_bmap_nr on disk for file systems >= 8 TiB Jeff Mahoney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-09 1:19 [patch 0/3] reiserfs: support for file systems > " Jeff Mahoney
2007-08-09 1:19 ` [patch 2/3] reiserfs: ignore s_bmap_nr on disk for file systems >= " Jeff Mahoney
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.