* [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state
@ 2007-03-21 8:07 bugme-daemon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2007-03-21 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
akpm@osdl.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |akpm@osdl.org
------- Additional Comments From akpm@osdl.org 2007-03-21 01:07 -------
You claim that this bug was present in 2.6.20.3 and that it was not present in
2.6.20.3.
Please clarify?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state
@ 2007-03-21 8:28 bugme-daemon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2007-03-21 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
------- Additional Comments From akolisek@linuxx.hyperlinx.cz 2007-03-21 01:28 -------
Sorry, bug is present in 2.6.20.X (my current kernel is 2.6.20.3, this bug is
present in 2.6.20.3 too).
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state
@ 2007-03-21 16:22 bugme-daemon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2007-03-21 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
------- Additional Comments From akpm@osdl.org 2007-03-21 09:22 -------
OK. And are you able to identify the most recent kernel which did not have this
bug? So we can work out when it was introduced?
Thanks.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state
[not found] <bug-8243-3570@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
@ 2007-07-14 3:42 ` bugme-daemon
2007-08-27 19:46 ` bugme-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2007-07-14 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
bunk@stusta.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bunk@stusta.de
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA
------- Comment #4 from bunk@stusta.de 2007-07-13 20:47 -------
Please reopen this bug if:
- it is still present with kernel 2.6.22 and
- you can provide the requested information.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state
[not found] <bug-8243-3570@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2007-07-14 3:42 ` [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state bugme-daemon
@ 2007-08-27 19:46 ` bugme-daemon
2007-08-27 20:27 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-08-27 20:18 ` bugme-daemon
2007-08-27 20:19 ` bugme-daemon
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2007-08-27 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
akolisek@linuxx.hyperlinx.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REJECTED |REOPENED
Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA |
------- Comment #5 from akolisek@linuxx.hyperlinx.cz 2007-08-27 12:46 -------
This bug is present in kernel 2.6.22(.1,2,3,4,5) too :(
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state
[not found] ` <20070827194633.44C5010807D@picon.linux-foundation.org>
@ 2007-08-27 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 20:19 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2007-08-27 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-acpi; +Cc: Dave Jones
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
This is presently assigned to cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk. Should it
be assigned to acpi instead?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state
[not found] <bug-8243-3570@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2007-07-14 3:42 ` [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state bugme-daemon
2007-08-27 19:46 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2007-08-27 20:18 ` bugme-daemon
2007-08-27 20:19 ` bugme-daemon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2007-08-27 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
davej@codemonkey.org.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|cpufreq |Power-Processor
Product|Power Management |ACPI
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state
2007-08-27 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2007-08-27 20:19 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2007-08-27 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-acpi
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 01:01:46PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
> bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
>
> This is presently assigned to cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk. Should it
> be assigned to acpi instead?
Yes. cpufreq does nothing with c states.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state
[not found] <bug-8243-3570@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-08-27 20:18 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2007-08-27 20:19 ` bugme-daemon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2007-08-27 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
davej@codemonkey.org.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk |acpi_power-processor@kernel-
| |bugs.osdl.org
Status|REOPENED |NEW
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state
2007-08-27 19:46 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2007-08-27 20:27 ` Rafał Bilski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Bilski @ 2007-08-27 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akolisek; +Cc: cpufreq
> This bug is present in kernel 2.6.22(.1,2,3,4,5) too :(
I don't get it. Where is the bug?
> Why my CPU is not in C1 state, when works on 100%? And where is C0 state?
C0 means that CPU is working so it isn't listed.
I think that You have misunderstood this file. It isn't printing current
CPU state. It is listing all available sleep states in order from
low latency and higher power consumption to high latency and lower power
consumption. Star means state that will be used when CPU become idle.
"Latency" means time needed to enter sleep state and time needed to wakeup
when something will happen (interrupt or BM DMA for example). So it is
perfectly OK to use C4 when there it isn't much to do and C2 when CPU is
spending less time sleeping.
Kernel compilation isn't causing 100% CPU usage. Processor is sleeping
during I/O wait. Well, unless You are using -j2 or higher.
> state T4 is activated, but only a few seconds and then it goes back to T0. Is
> this ok?
Yes. BIOS option "use throttling to rescue CPU when it is overheating"
interfering.
Regards
Rafa³
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jak najszybciej dostac sie na wymarzona plaze?
Znajdz trase ekspresowa
>>>http://link.interia.pl/f1b0c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-27 20:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-8243-3570@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2007-07-14 3:42 ` [Bug 8243] Problem with Throttling and CPU power state bugme-daemon
2007-08-27 19:46 ` bugme-daemon
2007-08-27 20:27 ` Rafał Bilski
2007-08-27 20:18 ` bugme-daemon
2007-08-27 20:19 ` bugme-daemon
[not found] <bug-8243-27@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
[not found] ` <20070827194633.44C5010807D@picon.linux-foundation.org>
2007-08-27 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 20:19 ` Dave Jones
2007-03-21 16:22 bugme-daemon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-21 8:28 bugme-daemon
2007-03-21 8:07 bugme-daemon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.