From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Dead Gateway Detection & BGP
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:27:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D503D4.9040106@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00a101c7e806$adc89500$0959bf00$@net.nz>
On 8/27/2007 12:21 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> It is OK to charge for any provided service, good or bad. It is not OK
> to label this as "giving back as much as was offered".
I'm not sure that I completely understand what you are trying to get at,
therefore I can not comment correctly.
However, I was trying to imply that my company has spent time and money
to develop a configuration (what) including the order in which things
are configured in (how). With the order of configuration (how) being
more of our information that we are not eager to give up. We are more
than willing to list out the components (what) that were used and
possibly even some of an order, but not all of the order.
With that being said, I think offering up the what for free with out the
how (below) is fairly good while still protecting our time and money
investment.
The "what" would consist of the following:
- Large over all block diagram.
- List of modules used for each block.
- List of optional modules used for each block.
- Explanation of what each module does to fulfill the block.
- Possibly some how or indicate to follow Read-Me(s).
The "how" would consist of the following:
- How to configure each module to achieve the desired result.
The "how" is where our company has spent the most time and money to get
things to work and achieve much larger projects.
Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-29 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-26 17:29 [LARTC] Dead Gateway Detection & BGP Rangi Biddle
2007-08-27 14:42 ` Grant Taylor
2007-08-27 16:51 ` Grant Taylor
2007-08-27 17:21 ` Peter Rabbitson
2007-08-29 5:27 ` Grant Taylor [this message]
2007-08-29 5:40 ` Grant Taylor
2007-08-30 1:50 ` Rangi Biddle
2007-08-30 2:40 ` Grant Taylor
2007-08-30 3:58 ` Grant Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46D503D4.9040106@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.