From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 07/20] svc: centralise close handling
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:16:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D5B809.9020807@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070820162336.15224.39616.stgit@dell3.ogc.int>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3296 bytes --]
Tom Tucker wrote:
> Centralise the handling of the SK_CLOSE bit so that future
> server transport implementations will be easier to
> write correctly. The xpt_recvfrom method does not
> need to check for SK_CLOSE anymore, that's handled in
> core code.
You are removing the test_bit(SK_CLOSE) from the transport specific
recvfrom functions into the main svc_recv() entry point. This moves the
test before this code:
if ((rqstp->rq_deferred = svc_deferred_dequeue(svsk))) {
svc_sock_received(svsk);
return svc_deferred_recv(rqstp);
}
Why not move this test too (it's the same in both the tcp and udp
recvfrom routines)?
Is it always safe to check if the socket is closed before checking the
deferred queue? Does that mean that now deferred requests are
automatically thrown away if SK_CLOSE is set?
> Signed-off-by: Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Leckie <pleckie@melbourne.sgi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
> ---
>
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index 8fad53d..5c3a794 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -756,11 +756,6 @@ svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> return svc_deferred_recv(rqstp);
> }
>
> - if (test_bit(SK_CLOSE, &svsk->sk_flags)) {
> - svc_delete_socket(svsk);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> clear_bit(SK_DATA, &svsk->sk_flags);
> skb = NULL;
> err = kernel_recvmsg(svsk->sk_sock, &msg, NULL,
> @@ -1158,11 +1153,6 @@ svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> return svc_deferred_recv(rqstp);
> }
>
> - if (test_bit(SK_CLOSE, &svsk->sk_flags)) {
> - svc_delete_socket(svsk);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
Should you also remove the "test_bit(SK_CLOSE)" from the dprintk in this
function?
> if (svsk->sk_sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
> svc_tcp_accept(svsk);
> svc_sock_received(svsk);
> @@ -1406,8 +1396,10 @@ svc_tcp_init(struct svc_sock *svsk)
>
> set_bit(SK_CHNGBUF, &svsk->sk_flags);
> set_bit(SK_DATA, &svsk->sk_flags);
> - if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED)
> + if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) {
> + /* note: caller calls svc_sock_enqueue() */
> set_bit(SK_CLOSE, &svsk->sk_flags);
> + }
> }
> }
The comment is unclear. Maybe a longer block comment is needed before
the if statement. Do you really need the brackets here?
> @@ -1525,10 +1517,16 @@ svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long ti
> }
> spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
>
> - dprintk("svc: server %p, pool %u, socket %p, inuse=%d\n",
> - rqstp, pool->sp_id, svsk, atomic_read(&svsk->sk_inuse));
> - len = svsk->sk_xprt->xpt_recvfrom(rqstp);
> - dprintk("svc: got len=%d\n", len);
> + len = 0;
> + if (test_bit(SK_CLOSE, &svsk->sk_flags)) {
> + dprintk("svc_recv: found SK_CLOSE\n");
> + svc_delete_socket(svsk);
> + } else {
> + dprintk("svc: server %p, pool %u, socket %p, inuse=%d\n",
> + rqstp, pool->sp_id, svsk, atomic_read(&svsk->sk_inuse));
> + len = svsk->sk_xprt->xpt_recvfrom(rqstp);
> + dprintk("svc: got len=%d\n", len);
> + }
>
> /* No data, incomplete (TCP) read, or accept() */
> if (len == 0 || len == -EAGAIN) {
[-- Attachment #2: chuck.lever.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 315 bytes --]
begin:vcard
fn:Chuck Lever
n:Lever;Chuck
org:Oracle Corporation;Corporate Architecture: Linux Projects Group
adr:;;1015 Granger Avenue;Ann Arbor;MI;48104;USA
email;internet:chuck dot lever at nospam oracle dot com
title:Principal Member of Staff
tel;work:+1 248 614 5091
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 315 bytes --]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-29 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-20 16:20 [RFC,PATCH 00/20] svc: Server Side Transport Switch Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC, PATCH 01/20] svc: Add svc_xprt transport switch structure Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 02/20] svc: xpt_detach and xpt_free Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 17:05 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-29 17:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 03/20] svc: xpt_prep_reply_hdr Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 17:15 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-29 18:28 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 05/20] svc: xpt_max_payload Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 17:40 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-29 19:06 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC, PATCH 06/20] svc: export svc_sock_enqueue, svc_sock_received Tom Tucker
2007-08-21 16:03 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-21 18:08 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 07/20] svc: centralise close handling Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 18:16 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 08/20] svc: centralise accept handling Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 18:40 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-29 23:56 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 09/20] svc: Add SK_LISTENER flag Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 18:41 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 10/20] svc: Add generic refcount services Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 18:55 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-29 20:19 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 11/20] svc: cleanup svc_sock initialization Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 19:07 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 13/20] svc: Add svc_[un]register_transport Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 19:12 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-29 20:32 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 14/20] svc: Register TCP/UDP Transports Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 15/20] svc: transport file implementation Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 19:15 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-29 20:37 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 16/20] svc: xpt_create_svc Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 19:21 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-29 20:43 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 17/20] svc: Add xpt_get_name service Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:23 ` [RFC,PATCH 18/20] svc: Add xpt_defer transport function Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 19:29 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-29 21:34 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:24 ` [RFC,PATCH 19/20] knfsd: call svc_create_svcsock Tom Tucker
2007-08-20 16:24 ` [RFC,PATCH 20/20] knfsd: create listener via portlist write Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 16:50 ` [RFC,PATCH 00/20] svc: Server Side Transport Switch Chuck Lever
2007-08-29 17:01 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-08-29 17:59 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-30 21:12 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-31 1:19 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-08-29 16:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20070820162329.15224.29032.stgit@dell3.ogc.int>
2007-08-29 17:32 ` [RFC,PATCH 04/20] svc: xpt_has_wspace Chuck Lever
2007-08-29 18:50 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 17:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-29 18:52 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 18:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-29 19:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-29 20:11 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 20:26 ` Tom Tucker
2007-08-29 20:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-29 20:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-10 5:27 [RFC,PATCH 00/20] svc: sunrpc server side transport switch Tom Tucker
2007-07-10 5:34 ` [RFC,PATCH 07/20] svc: centralise close handling Tom Tucker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46D5B809.9020807@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.