From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: wither bounds checking for networking sysctls
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:09:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D76A3D.9090207@hp.com> (raw)
While messing about with "sysctl_tcp_rto_min" I went back and forth a
bit as to whether there should have been bounds checking (as did some of
the folks who did some internal review for me). That leads to the
question - is it considered worthwhile to add a bit more bounds checking
to sundry networking sysctls?
rick jones
next reply other threads:[~2007-08-31 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-31 1:09 Rick Jones [this message]
2007-08-31 3:59 ` wither bounds checking for networking sysctls Stephen Hemminger
2007-08-31 17:14 ` Rick Jones
2007-09-09 15:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46D76A3D.9090207@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.