From: Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org>
To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:37:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E7CF5F.3090909@walrond.org> (raw)
I have to make buying decisions, and having tested a Sun T1000 for a
while I am impressed with Suns hardware. But, we are 100% gnu/linux and
it disturbs me that David Miller seems to be a (very impressive) team of
1 on the sparclinux ML (My impression; perhaps I am wrong?)
So I wonder, is Sun putting any more effort into developing and
supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain?
[Apologies for slightly off-topic post]
Andrew Walrond
next reply other threads:[~2007-09-12 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-12 11:37 Andrew Walrond [this message]
2007-09-12 12:23 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils David Miller
2007-09-12 13:22 ` Andrew Walrond
2007-09-12 13:25 ` Gordan Bobic
2007-09-12 13:28 ` Tim Prince
2007-09-13 6:23 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Lijuan Hai
2007-09-13 9:16 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain Sunil Amitkumar Janki
2007-09-13 9:33 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils David Miller
2007-09-13 10:17 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain Andrew Walrond
2007-09-13 10:36 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils Andrew Walrond
2007-09-13 10:47 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Eric Botcazou
2007-09-13 11:16 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain Andrew Walrond
2007-09-13 11:35 ` Sunil Amitkumar Janki
2007-09-13 12:14 ` Chris Newport
2007-09-13 13:01 ` Sunil Amitkumar Janki
2007-09-13 14:02 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils Andrew Walrond
2007-09-13 21:53 ` David Miller
2007-09-14 5:31 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? NightStrike
2007-09-14 5:43 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils Andrew Walrond
2007-09-14 5:51 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Eric Botcazou
2007-09-14 6:17 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils Hamish Greig
2007-09-14 16:27 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Joe Buck
2007-09-14 17:20 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils David Carlton
2007-09-14 21:43 ` Andrew Walrond
2007-09-14 22:01 ` David Miller
2007-09-14 22:54 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain Andrew Walrond
2007-09-14 22:57 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46E7CF5F.3090909@walrond.org \
--to=andrew@walrond.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.