All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org>
To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:43:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EA1F87.1000905@walrond.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46E7CF5F.3090909@walrond.org>

David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Walrond <andrew@walrond.org>
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:02:08 +0100
> 
>> So, Sun really _don't_ give a damn about gnu/linux on sparc64.
> 
> That is a gross mischaracterization of the situation, don't
> say this, it isn't true at all.
> 
> I have a full rack of Niagara systems that proves that Sun
> cares to some extent.  I get early hardware access and
> documentation access, plus engineers to talk to and ask
> questions of.
> 

With all due respect to your incredible efforts, this amounts to crumbs
from their table.

When, a multi-billion dollar company allocate ZERO development personnel
to support their flagship platform on gnu/linux, I believe the reality
of the situation is self evident.

> 
> I know what you are after, and it doesn't happen overnight.  So don't

Indeed; just perhaps a transcript of this thread will end up on an
influential desk, and just maybe they will understand the absurdity of
the situation.

For myself; I had no idea I was so transparent ;)

> be spastic and just whine as the only possible effect that will have
> is to scare them off and put Sun in reverse gear instead of continuing
> forward.
> 

I'll not bite on the first part; If you reread the thread I think you'd
have to agree that 'spastic whining' is "a gross mischaracterization of
the situation".

As to the second part; Sun are certainly 'bigger' than that.

Andrew Walrond

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-14  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-12 11:37 Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain Andrew Walrond
2007-09-12 12:23 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils David Miller
2007-09-12 13:22 ` Andrew Walrond
2007-09-12 13:25 ` Gordan Bobic
2007-09-12 13:28 ` Tim Prince
2007-09-13  6:23 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Lijuan Hai
2007-09-13  9:16 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain Sunil Amitkumar Janki
2007-09-13  9:33 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils David Miller
2007-09-13 10:17 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain Andrew Walrond
2007-09-13 10:36 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils Andrew Walrond
2007-09-13 10:47 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Eric Botcazou
2007-09-13 11:16 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain Andrew Walrond
2007-09-13 11:35 ` Sunil Amitkumar Janki
2007-09-13 12:14 ` Chris Newport
2007-09-13 13:01 ` Sunil Amitkumar Janki
2007-09-13 14:02 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils Andrew Walrond
2007-09-13 21:53 ` David Miller
2007-09-14  5:31 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? NightStrike
2007-09-14  5:43 ` Andrew Walrond [this message]
2007-09-14  5:51 ` Eric Botcazou
2007-09-14  6:17 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils Hamish Greig
2007-09-14 16:27 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Joe Buck
2007-09-14 17:20 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils David Carlton
2007-09-14 21:43 ` Andrew Walrond
2007-09-14 22:01 ` David Miller
2007-09-14 22:54 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain Andrew Walrond
2007-09-14 22:57 ` Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46EA1F87.1000905@walrond.org \
    --to=andrew@walrond.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.