Bug#407690: marked as done (ld10k1 segfaults on 2.6.19 kernel)

Bug#407690: marked as done (ld10k1 segfaults on 2.6.19 kernel)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 751 bytes --]

Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:04:37 +0200
with message-id <20070911200437.GS17585@frodo.home.lxtec.de>
and subject line Bug#407690: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#407690: kernel 2.6.19.2 incompatibel with debian libasound2-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3116 bytes --]

From: Markus Schulz <msc@antzsystem.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: segfault on starting ld10k1
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:48:25 +0100
Message-ID: <20070120144825.28798.9415.reportbug@nias.19.ros.03046.com>

Package: ld10k1
Version: 1.0.13-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

segfaults at startup

if compiled source-package version and generated a backtrace.

(gdb) bt
#0  0xb7ef9410 in ?? ()
#1  0xbf92f5fc in ?? ()
#2  0x00000006 in ?? ()
#3  0x00006fdc in ?? ()
#4  0xb7cd69d1 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#5  0xb7cd8219 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#6  0xb7d0c88a in __fsetlocking () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#7  0xb7d141df in mallopt () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#8  0xb7d14282 in free () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#9  0x08052264 in ld10k1_init_driver (dsp_mgr=0x8056dc0, tram_size=0) at
ld10k1_driver.c:414
#10 0x0805037c in main_loop (param=0xbf9307b8, audigy=0,
    card_id=0xbf9304d8 "Live",
        tram_size=0, ctlp=0x8066260) at ld10k1_fnc1.c:202
#11 0x08049e6e in main (argc=1, argv=0xbf930884) at ld10k1.c:333



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.19.2-nias
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages ld10k1 depends on:
ii  libasound2                  1.0.13-1     ALSA library
ii  libc6                       2.3.6.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  liblo10k1-0                 1.0.13-1     ALSA emu10k1/2 patch-loader librar
ii  lsb-base                    3.1-22       Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip

ld10k1 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3958 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 649 bytes --]

On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
Markus Schulz told:

> Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 23:20 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
> > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 the mental interface of
> >
> > Markus Schulz told:
> > > Am Montag, 22. Januar 2007 22:34 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter:
> > > [..wrong patch..]
> > >
> > > > No, thats me ;)
> > >
> > > ok, i will try with new kernel build soon.
> 
> works fine with original debian ld10k1 packages and patched 
> alsa-drivers, thanks.

Forgot to close this. Included in 1.0.14 and should work fine now.

Elimar


-- 
  You cannot propel yourself forward by
  patting yourself on the back.

[-- Attachment #3.1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

Re: Bug#407690: marked as done (ld10k1 segfaults on 2.6.19 kernel)

[Rene Herman]

On 09/11/2007 10:06 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

> Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:04:37 +0200 [ ... ]

I just accepted these from the moderation queue, but do we actually want 
these here? I was sort of pleased a while ago when mail from the alsa 
bugtracker stopped pouring into here...

"Yes we do" is a fine answer -- just asking.

Rene.

Re: Bug#407690: marked as done (ld10k1 segfaults on 2.6.19 kernel)

[Rene Herman]

On 09/12/2007 10:58 PM, Rene Herman wrote:

> On 09/11/2007 10:06 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> 
>> Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:04:37 +0200 [ ... ]
> 
> I just accepted these from the moderation queue, but do we actually want 
> these here? I was sort of pleased a while ago when mail from the alsa 
> bugtracker stopped pouring into here...
> 
> "Yes we do" is a fine answer -- just asking.

Okay, there's now ten more of these in the queue so I'm going to wait for an 
answer. My answer is "no".

Rene.

Re: Bug#407690: marked as done (ld10k1 segfaults on 2.6.19 kernel)

[Rene Herman]

On 09/12/2007 11:03 PM, Rene Herman wrote:

>> On 09/11/2007 10:06 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>
>>> Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:04:37 +0200 [ ... ]

>> I just accepted these from the moderation queue, but do we actually want 
>> these here? I was sort of pleased a while ago when mail from the alsa 
>> bugtracker stopped pouring into here...
>>
>> "Yes we do" is a fine answer -- just asking.
> 
> Okay, there's now ten more of these in the queue so I'm going to wait for an 
> answer. My answer is "no".

A private reply said they were posted by accident, so no opinions needed...

Rene.