From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:00:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EB9134.8070505@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97D612E30E1F88419025B06CB4CF1BE10379EBF9@scsmsx412.amr.corp.intel.com>
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> To me this is the beginning of fragmentation. Why do we need different
> and VMM-specific Linux paravirtualization for hardware-assisted
> virtualization? That would not be good for Linux.
>
>
The only way to have a single interface is if a central authority
defines and documents that interface, and all hypervisor implementors
agree not to implement extensions. Do you see that happening?
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:00:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EB9134.8070505@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97D612E30E1F88419025B06CB4CF1BE10379EBF9-1a9uaKK1+wJcIJlls4ac1rfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> To me this is the beginning of fragmentation. Why do we need different
> and VMM-specific Linux paravirtualization for hardware-assisted
> virtualization? That would not be good for Linux.
>
>
The only way to have a single interface is if a central authority
defines and documents that interface, and all hypervisor implementors
agree not to implement extensions. Do you see that happening?
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-15 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-14 19:45 [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure Anthony Liguori
[not found] ` <11897991353793-git-send-email-aliguori-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2007-09-14 19:47 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-09-14 20:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-14 21:02 ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2007-09-14 21:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-09-14 21:20 ` [kvm-devel] " Zachary Amsden
2007-09-14 21:20 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-09-14 21:44 ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2007-09-14 21:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-09-15 3:37 ` [kvm-devel] " Zachary Amsden
2007-09-15 3:37 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-09-15 8:08 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-09-15 8:08 ` Avi Kivity
2007-09-15 17:33 ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2007-09-15 17:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-09-14 21:22 ` [kvm-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-14 21:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-14 21:46 ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2007-09-14 21:46 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-09-14 21:52 ` [kvm-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-14 21:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-14 22:08 ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2007-09-14 22:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-09-14 22:40 ` [kvm-devel] " Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-14 22:40 ` Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-14 23:00 ` [kvm-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-14 23:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-15 0:10 ` [kvm-devel] " Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-15 0:10 ` Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-15 0:28 ` [kvm-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-15 0:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-15 1:04 ` [kvm-devel] " Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-15 1:04 ` Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-15 4:53 ` [kvm-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-15 4:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-15 6:11 ` [kvm-devel] " Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-15 6:11 ` Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-15 18:23 ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2007-09-17 18:14 ` Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-17 18:14 ` Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-17 18:27 ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2007-09-17 19:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-17 19:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-17 19:33 ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2007-09-17 19:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-09-17 19:15 ` [kvm-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-09-17 20:52 ` Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-17 20:52 ` Nakajima, Jun
2007-09-15 8:00 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2007-09-15 8:00 ` Avi Kivity
2007-09-15 7:53 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-09-15 7:53 ` Avi Kivity
2007-09-15 2:35 ` Rusty Russell
2007-09-15 2:35 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46EB9134.8070505@qumranet.com \
--to=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.