From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>
To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org
Subject: Re: Having individual receiver in To: field
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:53:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F00271.8050805@goirand.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1557ec740709171048y2b7c2e08g5c9fbfe40196087a@mail.gmail.com>
Raymond den Ouden wrote:
> Christian Laursen wrote:
>> Neale Pickett <neale@woozle.org> writes:
>>> Neale Pickett <neale@woozle.org> writes:
>>>> That's not really how mail lists are supposed to work. I don't think
>>>> mlmmj has a way to set this up. Why do you want such a thing?
>>>>
>>> Holy cow, I stand corrected, the "addtohdr" tunable does this.
>>>
>>> Why would anybody want such a thing?
>>>
>>
>> It makes sense for newsletters and announce lists and that sort of
>> thing.
>>
> And not to forget. Hotmail tend to drop mails which does not have the
> receiver in one of the address headers in the spam box.
> The sportclub I manage a few lists for had the problem that specifically
> hotmail users did not receive the mailinglist mails.
>
> With using the addtohdr I managed to work around this annoying hotmail
> "bug".
>
> As a matter of fact, that was the main reason for me to move to mlmmj
We do VPS hosting. We also use this brilliant function to send email to
a list of users when there's a problem on one of our server. We don't
really want people to read "whateverusers@example.com", as it's not
meant to be used as a list. We also set the list as closed, and
moderated, so the people we send mail to can't send to the list.
This makes me think that I would have like a way that only certain
person (like the list owners or the moderators) could send to the
moderated list without the hassle of having to approve the messages. On
a busy mail server it can take some time until we receive the moderation
message. I don't really know how this could be implemented, but what I
thought about would be something like a password in the subject that
would be removed, for example (this is not very nice, but that's the
only thing I can think of). I know that the From: checking is not enough
as this could be faked. Does anybody has a better idea for that one?
Thomas Goirand, GPLHost CEO
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-18 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-17 17:48 Having individual receiver in To: field Daniel Albuschat
2007-09-17 17:56 ` Christian Laursen
2007-09-17 18:11 ` Neale Pickett
2007-09-17 18:43 ` Neale Pickett
2007-09-17 19:03 ` Christian Laursen
2007-09-17 19:21 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2007-09-18 13:01 ` Raymond den Ouden
2007-09-18 15:08 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2007-09-18 16:00 ` Raymond den Ouden
2007-09-18 16:53 ` Thomas Goirand [this message]
2007-09-18 17:24 ` Neale Pickett
2007-09-18 18:11 ` Christian Laursen
2007-09-18 19:01 ` Franky Van Liedekerke
2007-09-18 21:12 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2007-09-18 22:58 ` Neale Pickett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46F00271.8050805@goirand.fr \
--to=thomas@goirand.fr \
--cc=mlmmj@mlmmj.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.