* [PATCH] dm: fix freeze_bdev() return value check
@ 2007-09-24 10:56 Akinobu Mita
2007-09-24 13:04 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-09-25 14:23 ` Akinobu Mita
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Akinobu Mita @ 2007-09-24 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dm-devel
freeze_bdev() does not return errno as pointer on failure.
This patch fixes the return value check.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
---
drivers/md/dm.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/md/dm.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6-git.orig/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ 2.6-git/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1290,16 +1290,11 @@ out:
*/
static int lock_fs(struct mapped_device *md)
{
- int r;
-
WARN_ON(md->frozen_sb);
md->frozen_sb = freeze_bdev(md->suspended_bdev);
- if (IS_ERR(md->frozen_sb)) {
- r = PTR_ERR(md->frozen_sb);
- md->frozen_sb = NULL;
- return r;
- }
+ if (!md->frozen_sb)
+ return -ENODEV;
set_bit(DMF_FROZEN, &md->flags);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dm: fix freeze_bdev() return value check
2007-09-24 10:56 [PATCH] dm: fix freeze_bdev() return value check Akinobu Mita
@ 2007-09-24 13:04 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-09-25 14:23 ` Akinobu Mita
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alasdair G Kergon @ 2007-09-24 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: device-mapper development
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 07:56:36PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> freeze_bdev() does not return errno as pointer on failure.
Please check the history of this - was this ever in the tree
or is it still pending or not?
Alasdair
--
agk@redhat.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dm: fix freeze_bdev() return value check
2007-09-24 10:56 [PATCH] dm: fix freeze_bdev() return value check Akinobu Mita
2007-09-24 13:04 ` Alasdair G Kergon
@ 2007-09-25 14:23 ` Akinobu Mita
2007-09-25 15:52 ` Milan Broz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Akinobu Mita @ 2007-09-25 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dm-devel; +Cc: Alasdair G Kergon
2007/9/24, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>:
> freeze_bdev() does not return errno as pointer on failure.
> This patch fixes the return value check.
I misunderstood the meaning of the return value of freeze_bdev().
I thought NULL returned by freeze_bdev means error. But it is wrong.
freeze_bdev returns NULL when there is no filesystem mounted on the
device with holding bd_mount_sem.
So this patch is totally broken.
But there is no reason to check the return value with IS_ERR().
Because freeze_bdev return NULL or valid super block
Subject: [PATCH] dm: remove freeze_bdev() return value check
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
There is no reason to check the return value with IS_ERR().
Because freeze_bdev return NULL or valid super block.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
---
drivers/md/dm.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/md/dm.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6-git.orig/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ 2.6-git/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1290,16 +1290,9 @@ out:
*/
static int lock_fs(struct mapped_device *md)
{
- int r;
-
WARN_ON(md->frozen_sb);
md->frozen_sb = freeze_bdev(md->suspended_bdev);
- if (IS_ERR(md->frozen_sb)) {
- r = PTR_ERR(md->frozen_sb);
- md->frozen_sb = NULL;
- return r;
- }
set_bit(DMF_FROZEN, &md->flags);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: Re: [PATCH] dm: fix freeze_bdev() return value check
2007-09-25 14:23 ` Akinobu Mita
@ 2007-09-25 15:52 ` Milan Broz
2007-09-25 15:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Milan Broz @ 2007-09-25 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: device-mapper development; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig
Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2007/9/24, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>:
>> freeze_bdev() does not return errno as pointer on failure.
>> This patch fixes the return value check.
>
...
> But there is no reason to check the return value with IS_ERR().
> Because freeze_bdev return NULL or valid super block
Yes, but there is another place in kernel using this check
(see /fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c)
Probably question for Christoph Hellwig - some changes related to
returning error in frezze_bdev() were planned but never commited.
(see list archive)
Otherwise test for IS_ERR() should be removed.
Milan
--
mbroz@redhat.com
>
> Subject: [PATCH] dm: remove freeze_bdev() return value check
> From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
>
> There is no reason to check the return value with IS_ERR().
> Because freeze_bdev return NULL or valid super block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm.c | 7 -------
> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> Index: 2.6-git/drivers/md/dm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6-git.orig/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ 2.6-git/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -1290,16 +1290,9 @@ out:
> */
> static int lock_fs(struct mapped_device *md)
> {
> - int r;
> -
> WARN_ON(md->frozen_sb);
>
> md->frozen_sb = freeze_bdev(md->suspended_bdev);
> - if (IS_ERR(md->frozen_sb)) {
> - r = PTR_ERR(md->frozen_sb);
> - md->frozen_sb = NULL;
> - return r;
> - }
>
> set_bit(DMF_FROZEN, &md->flags);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: Re: [PATCH] dm: fix freeze_bdev() return value check
2007-09-25 15:52 ` Milan Broz
@ 2007-09-25 15:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2007-09-25 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Milan Broz; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, device-mapper development
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 05:52:29PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> Akinobu Mita wrote:
> > 2007/9/24, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>:
> >> freeze_bdev() does not return errno as pointer on failure.
> >> This patch fixes the return value check.
> >
> ...
> > But there is no reason to check the return value with IS_ERR().
> > Because freeze_bdev return NULL or valid super block
>
> Yes, but there is another place in kernel using this check
> (see /fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c)
>
> Probably question for Christoph Hellwig - some changes related to
> returning error in frezze_bdev() were planned but never commited.
> (see list archive)
>
> Otherwise test for IS_ERR() should be removed.
The plan was to change freeze_bdev to do a trylock un s_umount_sem
and return SBUSY if it fails to avoid the deadlock scenario where
people called xfs_freeze and got another freeze request from dm.
I don't remember why this never got it, it's probably worth sending
a patch like this again.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-25 15:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-24 10:56 [PATCH] dm: fix freeze_bdev() return value check Akinobu Mita
2007-09-24 13:04 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2007-09-25 14:23 ` Akinobu Mita
2007-09-25 15:52 ` Milan Broz
2007-09-25 15:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.