* should the tur libchecker handle unit attention conditions?
@ 2007-10-10 15:48 Eddie Williams
2007-10-11 6:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eddie Williams @ 2007-10-10 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: device-mapper development
I have noticed situations where paths bounce using the tur libchecker
due to unit attention conditions. Would there be any objection for
attempting an automatic single retry in tur.c for a UA condition?
Eddie Williams
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: should the tur libchecker handle unit attention conditions?
2007-10-10 15:48 should the tur libchecker handle unit attention conditions? Eddie Williams
@ 2007-10-11 6:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2007-10-11 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: device-mapper development
Eddie Williams wrote:
> I have noticed situations where paths bounce using the tur libchecker
> due to unit attention conditions. Would there be any objection for
> attempting an automatic single retry in tur.c for a UA condition?
>
No, please do. I've run into the same problems with the path_priority
callouts and will have to fix them, too.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-11 6:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-10 15:48 should the tur libchecker handle unit attention conditions? Eddie Williams
2007-10-11 6:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.