* xenstore notifier: atomic or blocking?
@ 2007-10-18 8:51 Jan Beulich
2007-10-18 8:55 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2007-10-18 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Is there any reason why this notifier is atomic rather than blocking? 2.6.23
has it as a blocking one, and judging from its use this is the right thing to do.
Thanks, Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: xenstore notifier: atomic or blocking?
2007-10-18 8:51 xenstore notifier: atomic or blocking? Jan Beulich
@ 2007-10-18 8:55 ` Keir Fraser
2007-10-26 15:47 ` [PATCH] " Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2007-10-18 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, xen-devel
I expect the atomic one looked safer. :-) Feel free to send a patch.
-- Keir
On 18/10/07 09:51, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> Is there any reason why this notifier is atomic rather than blocking? 2.6.23
> has it as a blocking one, and judging from its use this is the right thing to
> do.
>
> Thanks, Jan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Re: xenstore notifier: atomic or blocking?
2007-10-18 8:55 ` Keir Fraser
@ 2007-10-26 15:47 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2007-10-26 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keir Fraser, xen-devel
There doesn't appear to be any need for it to be atomic.
As usual, written and tested against 2.6.23 and made apply against
2.6.18 without further testing.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: head-2007-10-23/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
===================================================================
--- head-2007-10-23.orig/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c 2007-10-25 15:08:03.000000000 +0200
+++ head-2007-10-23/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c 2007-10-25 15:08:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static unsigned long xen_store_mfn;
extern struct mutex xenwatch_mutex;
-static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(xenstore_chain);
+static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(xenstore_chain);
static void wait_for_devices(struct xenbus_driver *xendrv);
@@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ int register_xenstore_notifier(struct no
if (xenstored_ready > 0)
ret = nb->notifier_call(nb, 0, NULL);
else
- atomic_notifier_chain_register(&xenstore_chain, nb);
+ blocking_notifier_chain_register(&xenstore_chain, nb);
return ret;
}
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_xenstore_noti
void unregister_xenstore_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
- atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&xenstore_chain, nb);
+ blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&xenstore_chain, nb);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_xenstore_notifier);
@@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ void xenbus_probe(struct work_struct *un
xenbus_backend_probe_and_watch();
/* Notify others that xenstore is up */
- atomic_notifier_call_chain(&xenstore_chain, 0, NULL);
+ blocking_notifier_call_chain(&xenstore_chain, 0, NULL);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-26 15:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-18 8:51 xenstore notifier: atomic or blocking? Jan Beulich
2007-10-18 8:55 ` Keir Fraser
2007-10-26 15:47 ` [PATCH] " Jan Beulich
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.