From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: David Mack <dmack@juniper.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, esandeen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:59:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47179F1F.3030202@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7DCDA0F058071B49AED9D3D7886C41BE0966AEDB@muon.jnpr.net>
David Mack wrote:
> It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora
> 2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now.
>
> Huge thanks and great work, guys.
DaveJ, I didn't push anything upstream. Can you verify this now works?
Auke
>
> Dave
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kok, Auke [mailto:auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 10:05 AM
>> To: Herbert Xu
>> Cc: David Mack; Dave Jones; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
>> esandeen@redhat.com
>> Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
>>
>> Herbert Xu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:54:33AM -0700, David Mack wrote:
>>>> Still no joy here. See attached capture. What's really
>> weird is that it
>>>> shows *two* kernel panics, one in e100_poll and one in _list_add.
>>> Yes that's the symptom one would expect from that bug. We really
>>> need to apply the same fix that was done for e1000.
>> I feared that. its not the same as that commit that floated
>> around in this thread
>> and involves some reorganization in the init/probe code, so
>> it's a bit more
>> involved than just a few lines. I'll need a little bit of
>> time to generate this fix.
>>
>> Auke
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-18 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-26 15:04 e100 problems in .23rc8 ? Dave Jones
2007-09-26 18:10 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-26 18:18 ` Dave Jones
2007-09-27 6:58 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-11 0:36 ` Dave Jones
2007-10-11 1:25 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-11 16:10 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-11 17:25 ` Dave Jones
2007-10-11 18:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-10-12 14:54 ` David Mack
2007-10-12 15:35 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-12 15:51 ` David Mack
2007-10-13 2:35 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-16 14:33 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-10-16 14:35 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-16 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-10-16 16:39 ` David Mack
2007-10-12 17:04 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-18 17:51 ` David Mack
2007-10-18 17:59 ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2007-10-18 18:17 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-10-22 1:04 ` Dave Jones
2007-10-22 3:10 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-22 14:05 ` David Mack
2007-10-22 14:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-10-22 14:44 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-10-11 23:24 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47179F1F.3030202@intel.com \
--to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dmack@juniper.net \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.