Re: [oe-commits] org.oe.dev packages/webkit: Build and package naming fixes (when using debian renaming)

[Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

freyther commit schreef:
> packages/webkit: Build and package naming fixes (when using debian renaming)
>     We do not want the package to be named libwebkitgtk-launcher but want to
>     keep the webkit-gtklauncher names. 

Do we? I created and maintain those recipes, and I made the decision to
name it libwebkitgtk-launcher when using debian naming. I would have
used DEBIAN_NOAUTONAME_webkit-gtklauncher otherwise. Which brings me to
my second point:


> +python populate_packages_prepend() {
> +    print "foooo"
> +    print bb.data.getVar("DEBIAN_NAMES", d, True)
> +    if bb.data.getVar("DEBIAN_NAMES", d, True):
> +        base = bb.data.expand("${PN}launcher", d, True)
> +        bb.data.setVar("PKG_%s" % base, base, d)
> +        bb.data.setVar("PKG_%s-dbg" % base, "%s-dbg" % base, d)
> +}

Using python is unneeded and confusing. And as webkit maintainerin OE, I
don't want those in the recipes.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFHIXCDMkyGM64RGpERAqZuAKCsK/Dxm1EPgk0qEp+20dixabuHYwCeLTLv
Ztk68CUYd2ByaVgFxEh+67M=
=e/yc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----