From: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>,
yi.zhu@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Subject: Re: iwl4965 detection problem
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:10:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4721F55F.1030303@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4721E17E.2020908@sgi.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 839 bytes --]
Jes Sorensen wrote:
> At least it's consistent here as opposed to sometimes.
>
> One thing I noted is that rmmod often takes a few seconds, no idea
> if it has any value?
Ok,
I think I have an idea at whats going on - loading the module with debug
info revealed that it ended up straight in the interrupt handler the
moment the driver called request_irq(), but obviously before it was
ready to handle the interrupt in question. The net result was that it
didn't get to the loading of the ucode.
Unloading the module meant a call was made to iwl_disable_interrupts()
so on the next load, all pending interrupts in the chip had been cleared
and we didn't see this spurious interrupt.
I haven't had a chance to build the driver with this change, ie. it's
untested, but I have a suspicion that this patch might do the job.
Cheers,
Jes
[-- Attachment #2: iwl4965-irq-fix.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 707 bytes --]
Disable interrupts in the iwl4965 before calling request_irq() for
the case that the previous OS or the BIOS left a pending interrupt in
the chip. This behavior has been observed on some laptops such as T61
Thinkpads and Toshiba Portege R500
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
--- linux/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl4965-base.c~ 2007-10-26 06:49:02.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl4965-base.c 2007-10-26 16:03:40.387241088 +0200
@@ -9090,6 +9090,8 @@
priv->power_mode = IWL_POWER_AC;
priv->user_txpower_limit = IWL_DEFAULT_TX_POWER;
+ iwl_disable_interrupts(priv);
+
pci_enable_msi(pdev);
err = request_irq(pdev->irq, iwl_isr, IRQF_SHARED, DRV_NAME, priv);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-26 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-25 13:37 iwl4965 detection problem Jes Sorensen
2007-10-25 13:45 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-25 14:15 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-10-25 17:32 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-26 8:05 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-10-26 12:30 ` John W. Linville
2007-10-26 12:45 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-10-26 14:10 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2007-10-26 14:41 ` John W. Linville
2007-10-26 14:43 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-10-26 15:17 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-10-26 15:23 ` dragoran
2007-10-26 16:50 ` John W. Linville
2007-10-29 1:14 ` Zhu Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4721F55F.1030303@sgi.com \
--to=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.