From: Valentine Barshak <vbarshak@ru.mvista.com>
To: tnt@blacksnow.net
Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] USB: Rework OHCI PPC OF for new bindings
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:44:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4729CA20.6040905@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52304.213.186.37.16.1193915988.squirrel@www.opensources.be>
tnt@blacksnow.net wrote:
>>> USB_OHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_DESC/MMIO should always be enabled for ppc
>>> and USB_OHCI_LITTLE_ENDIAN is selected for USB_OHCI_HCD_PCI by default.
>
> I don't find those options useless. If you think the defauts are not the
> best change them but I find these options relevant. You don't always want
> the support for BE on PPC ... if the only controller you have is pci ...
> or if you're on a soc that use little endian ...
If I have just a pci controller, and don't expect to to find/use the
built-in one, why should I need the ohci-ppc-of driver then?
I'm not aware of a soc that uses little endian, but I think that LE/BE
still shouldn't be selected manually. It should be autoselected then,
the same way we select LE for PCI for example.
>
> Do we really need to stop supporting the old values right now ?
I've resubmitted the patches with the old mpc52xx bindings support.
Keeping old ohci-be/le stuff along with the new bindings doesn't look
good to me. However, I think we can live with the old ones and maybe
find a better way for OF ohci support later.
>
> IMHO, Changing to the usb-ohci with a property sounds fine to me if you
> really want to but don't drop support for the old values. They are not
> "bad". Change the dts to reflect the fact that the new "way" is preferred
> and a comment somewhere in the code and that should be fine.
OK
> Sylvain
>
Thanks,
Valentine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-01 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-24 16:22 [PATCH 0/2] USB: Rework OHCI PPC OF driver to support new bindings Valentine Barshak
2007-10-24 16:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] USB: Rework OHCI PPC OF for " Valentine Barshak
2007-10-24 22:05 ` Matt Sealey
2007-10-25 1:50 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2007-10-25 2:41 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-25 11:48 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-10-25 14:21 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-25 17:11 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-10-25 18:14 ` Matt Sealey
2007-10-25 18:13 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-10-25 18:10 ` Matt Sealey
2007-10-25 18:01 ` Matt Sealey
2007-10-25 18:50 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-10-25 22:02 ` Matt Sealey
2007-10-26 11:24 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-10-26 12:13 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-11-01 11:19 ` tnt
2007-11-01 12:44 ` Valentine Barshak [this message]
2007-11-01 13:46 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Dale Farnsworth
2007-10-24 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] PowerPC: Update USB OHCI DTS entires " Valentine Barshak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4729CA20.6040905@ru.mvista.com \
--to=vbarshak@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=tnt@blacksnow.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.