Re: Pid namespaces problems

[Cedric Le Goater <clg-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

> 
>> - There are several architectures with their own signal functions for
>>   other OS compatibility that have are using _pid and not _vpid
>>   variants of functions. (irix and solaris)
>>   arch/mips/kernel/irixsig.c:irix_waitsys
>>   arch/mips/kernel/sysirix.c:irix_setpgrp
>>   arch/sparc64/solaris/misc.c:solaris_procids
> 
> Ok. Looks like your list is the same as mine. That's good to hear
> that I haven't missed anything important.

We've also talked about af_unix credentials.

> So, I see that you're about to take a closer look at the pid
> namespaces. If so, then what time can we expect the net namespace
> activity to go on? Or (if you don't mind) can we start merging
> the patches to David as soon as he opens his 2.6.25 merge window?

I think daniel and benjamin are also getting ready for the 2.6.25 
merge window.

C.