From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Zach Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/7] x86: clean up asm-x86/page*.h
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:59:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <473378B3.1090700@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80711080842i201cb431le966d5069d59db24@mail.gmail.com>
Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2007 11:50 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>
>> +#define PAGETABLE_LEVELS 3
>> +
>> +typedef u64 pteval_t;
>> +typedef u64 pmdval_t;
>> +typedef u64 pudval_t;
>> +typedef u64 pgdval_t;
>> +
>>
>
>
>> -static inline unsigned long long native_pgd_val(pgd_t pgd)
>> +static inline pgdval_t native_pgd_val(pgd_t pgd)
>> {
>>
> Maybe these kind of things, the typedef and native_xxx definitions can
> go into the common header, after we define the PAGETABLE_LEVELS
> constant?
> I think the more goes into common headers, the better.
>
You mean put them in a common header, but conditionally by #if
PAGETABLE_LEVELS? I don't think that would be much of an improvement;
it would just add more #ifs, which adds lines and conceptual
complexity. If you go that way, you may as well put everything in one
header wrapped in #ifs, but personally I don't think that would help.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-08 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-08 1:50 [PATCH RFC 0/7] Unify asm-x86/pgtable.h and page.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-08 1:50 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] x86: kill mk_pte_huge Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-08 1:50 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] x86: clean up mm/init_32.c Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-08 16:20 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-11-08 16:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-08 1:50 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] x86: clean up asm-x86/page*.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-08 16:42 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-11-08 20:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-11-08 22:38 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-11-08 23:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-08 1:50 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] x86: unify pgtable*.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-08 1:50 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] x86: simplify pagetable-related operationsin paravirt.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-08 1:50 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] x86/xen: simplify Xen mmu operations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-08 1:50 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] x86: fix up formatting in pgtable*.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=473378B3.1090700@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.