From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Sergej Stepanov <Sergej.Stepanov@ids.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] using mii-bitbang on different processor ports - update the booting-without-of.txt-file
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:03:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <473484CB.1010604@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1194608283.8755.10.camel@p60635-ste.ids.de>
Sergej Stepanov wrote:
>> We also need to change the reference to port C in fsl,mdio-pin and
>> fsl,mdc-pin.
> Do you mean this:
> Currently defined compatibles:
> fsl,pq1-fec-mdio (reg is same as first resource of FEC device)
> -> fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang (reg is port C registers)
>
> Properties for fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang:
> -> fsl,mdio-pin : pin of port C controlling mdio data
> -> fsl,mdc-pin : pin of port C controlling mdio clock
Yes.
> Right. But i thought it would be related to the example,
> and than the reader gets the short comment about I/O ports.
No, the example is the example, and the spec is the spec. :-)
> Or the other variant would be:
> --------------------
> iv) MDIO
>
> Currently defined compatibles:
> fsl,pq1-fec-mdio (reg is same as first resource of FEC device)
> fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang (reg is the I/O port register block(s))
>
> Properties for fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang:
> The first reg resource is the I/O port register block on which MDIO
> resides. The second reg resource is the I/O port register block on
> which MDC resides. If there is only one reg resource, it is used for
> both MDIO and MDC.
> fsl,mdio-pin : pin of chosen port for controlling mdio data
> fsl,mdc-pin : pin of chosen port for controlling mdio clock
Looks good. We can eliminate the parenthetical for
fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang because reg is now explained below.
-Scott
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Sergej Stepanov <Sergej.Stepanov@ids.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] using mii-bitbang on different processor ports - update the booting-without-of.txt-file
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:03:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <473484CB.1010604@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1194608283.8755.10.camel@p60635-ste.ids.de>
Sergej Stepanov wrote:
>> We also need to change the reference to port C in fsl,mdio-pin and
>> fsl,mdc-pin.
> Do you mean this:
> Currently defined compatibles:
> fsl,pq1-fec-mdio (reg is same as first resource of FEC device)
> -> fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang (reg is port C registers)
>
> Properties for fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang:
> -> fsl,mdio-pin : pin of port C controlling mdio data
> -> fsl,mdc-pin : pin of port C controlling mdio clock
Yes.
> Right. But i thought it would be related to the example,
> and than the reader gets the short comment about I/O ports.
No, the example is the example, and the spec is the spec. :-)
> Or the other variant would be:
> --------------------
> iv) MDIO
>
> Currently defined compatibles:
> fsl,pq1-fec-mdio (reg is same as first resource of FEC device)
> fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang (reg is the I/O port register block(s))
>
> Properties for fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang:
> The first reg resource is the I/O port register block on which MDIO
> resides. The second reg resource is the I/O port register block on
> which MDC resides. If there is only one reg resource, it is used for
> both MDIO and MDC.
> fsl,mdio-pin : pin of chosen port for controlling mdio data
> fsl,mdc-pin : pin of chosen port for controlling mdio clock
Looks good. We can eliminate the parenthetical for
fsl,cpm2-mdio-bitbang because reg is now explained below.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-09 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-06 8:51 [PATCH] using mii-bitbang on different processor ports - update the booting-without-of.txt-file Sergej Stepanov
2007-11-06 18:46 ` Scott Wood
2007-11-07 13:40 ` Sergej Stepanov
2007-11-07 13:40 ` Sergej Stepanov
2007-11-08 20:20 ` Scott Wood
2007-11-09 11:38 ` Sergej Stepanov
2007-11-09 11:38 ` Sergej Stepanov
2007-11-09 16:03 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2007-11-09 16:03 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=473484CB.1010604@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=Sergej.Stepanov@ids.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.