From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: [PATCH] fs/xfs: remove duplicated defines
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:33:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47379F5A.20107@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071111134351.106efb98@lucky.kitzblitz>
Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> Timothy Shimmin wrote:
>> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> Nicolas Kaiser wrote:
>>>> Remove duplicated defines.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
>>>> ---
>>> Heh, each defined twice, but used 0 times in the kernel. Could probably
>>> just remove them altogether (though I guess btoc is used in
>>> xfstests/ltp/doio.c in userspace/xfstests, but that's the *only* place)
>>>
>> Yes, that's what I was just noticing - how they are not used anyway.
>>
>> > grep -Ir btoc . | egrep -v 'tag|anot'
>> ./linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:#define btoc(x)
>> (((__psunsigned_t)(x)+(NBPC-1))>>BPCSHIFT)
>> ./linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:#define btoct(x)
>> ((__psunsigned_t)(x)>>BPCSHIFT)
>> ./linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:#define btoc64(x)
>> (((__uint64_t)(x)+(NBPC-1))>>BPCSHIFT)
>> ./linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:#define btoct64(x) ((__uint64_t)(x)>>BPCSHIFT)
>> ./linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:#define btoct(x)
>> ((__psunsigned_t)(x)>>BPCSHIFT)
>> ./linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h:#define btoc(x)
>> (((__psunsigned_t)(x)+(NBPC-1))>>BPCSHIFT)
>> ./linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c: page_count = xfs_buf_btoc(end) -
>> xfs_buf_btoct(bp->b_file_offset);
>> ./linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c: page = bp->b_pages[xfs_buf_btoct(boff +
>> bp->b_offset)];
>> ./linux-2.6/xfs_buf.h:#define xfs_buf_btoc(dd) (((dd) +
>> PAGE_CACHE_SIZE-1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT)
>> ./linux-2.6/xfs_buf.h:#define xfs_buf_btoct(dd) ((dd) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT)
>>
>> --Tim
>>
>>> -Eric
>>>
>>>> fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h | 4 ----
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h 2007-11-07 11:26:20.000000000
>>>> +0100
>>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h 2007-11-11 13:07:11.000000000
>>>> +0100
>>>> @@ -167,12 +167,8 @@
>>>>
>>>> /* clicks to bytes */
>>>> #define ctob(x) ((__psunsigned_t)(x)<<BPCSHIFT)
>>>> -#define btoct(x) ((__psunsigned_t)(x)>>BPCSHIFT)
>>>> #define ctob64(x) ((__uint64_t)(x)<<BPCSHIFT)
>>>>
>>>> -/* bytes to clicks */
>>>> -#define btoc(x) (((__psunsigned_t)(x)+(NBPC-1))>>BPCSHIFT)
>>>> -
>>>> #define ENOATTR ENODATA /* Attribute not found */
>>>> #define EWRONGFS EINVAL /* Mount with wrong filesystem
>>>> type */
>>>> #define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN /* Filesystem is corrupted */
>>>>
>>>>
> So I'm thinking of "seeing" your patch and raising you by my attached patch :-)
>
> --Tim
>
>
> -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
> -- Type: text/x-patch
> -- File: btoc.patch
>
>
>
Where the attachment was supposed to look like...
=====================================Index: fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h
=====================================
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h 2007-11-12 11:24:05.000000000 +1100
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h 2007-11-12 11:14:22.818831666 +1100
@@ -159,12 +159,6 @@
/* number of BB's per block device block */
#define BLKDEV_BB BTOBB(BLKDEV_IOSIZE)
-/* bytes to clicks */
-#define btoc(x) (((__psunsigned_t)(x)+(NBPC-1))>>BPCSHIFT)
-#define btoct(x) ((__psunsigned_t)(x)>>BPCSHIFT)
-#define btoc64(x) (((__uint64_t)(x)+(NBPC-1))>>BPCSHIFT)
-#define btoct64(x) ((__uint64_t)(x)>>BPCSHIFT)
-
/* off_t bytes to clicks */
#define offtoc(x) (((__uint64_t)(x)+(NBPC-1))>>BPCSHIFT)
#define offtoct(x) ((xfs_off_t)(x)>>BPCSHIFT)
@@ -172,14 +166,6 @@
/* clicks to off_t bytes */
#define ctooff(x) ((xfs_off_t)(x)<<BPCSHIFT)
-/* clicks to bytes */
-#define ctob(x) ((__psunsigned_t)(x)<<BPCSHIFT)
-#define btoct(x) ((__psunsigned_t)(x)>>BPCSHIFT)
-#define ctob64(x) ((__uint64_t)(x)<<BPCSHIFT)
-
-/* bytes to clicks */
-#define btoc(x) (((__psunsigned_t)(x)+(NBPC-1))>>BPCSHIFT)
-
#define ENOATTR ENODATA /* Attribute not found */
#define EWRONGFS EINVAL /* Mount with wrong filesystem type */
#define EFSCORRUPTED EUCLEAN /* Filesystem is corrupted */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-12 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-11 12:43 [PATCH] fs/xfs: remove duplicated defines Nicolas Kaiser
2007-11-11 23:57 ` [xfs-masters] " Eric Sandeen
2007-11-11 23:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-11-12 0:09 ` Timothy Shimmin
2007-11-12 0:09 ` Timothy Shimmin
2007-11-12 0:28 ` Timothy Shimmin
2007-11-12 0:33 ` Timothy Shimmin [this message]
2007-11-12 2:04 ` [xfs-masters] " David Chinner
2007-11-13 5:35 ` Timothy Shimmin
2007-11-13 21:30 ` David Chinner
2007-11-14 2:46 ` Timothy Shimmin
2007-11-14 5:41 ` David Chinner
2007-11-15 0:54 ` Timothy Shimmin
2007-11-15 6:27 ` David Chinner
2007-11-16 5:34 ` [PATCH] remove BPCSHIFT and NB?P? macros - was fs/xfs: remove duplicated Timothy Shimmin
2007-11-16 6:15 ` [xfs-masters] [PATCH] remove BPCSHIFT and NB?P? macros - was Lachlan McIlroy
2007-11-16 6:15 ` [xfs-masters] [PATCH] remove BPCSHIFT and NB?P? macros - was fs/xfs: remove duplicated defines Lachlan McIlroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47379F5A.20107@sgi.com \
--to=tes@sgi.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.