* Config Q?: Preempt Model & Preempt Big Kern Lock
@ 2007-11-18 22:46 Linda Walsh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Linda Walsh @ 2007-11-18 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Not big deal, just some config-validity questions regarding
i386 preemption models and preemption of the big-kern lock.
I.e. the relevant options are:
(PM) "Preemption model", there are 3 choices (i386):
(none) No Forced Preemption (Server)
(vol) Voluntary Preempt (Desktop)
(full) Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)
(PBL) "Preempt The Big Kernel Lock" (hint: use Y for desktop, else N)
===
Are these all "valid" config states? Should they all be valid?
I.e., does it make sense to allow "PM==none && PBL==T" ?
Does it makes sense to allow "(PM==full) && PBL==F" ?
Is the issue of big-kernel-lock preemption of major consequence
these days, or should it work in all cases? Are there cases
where one might want PBL==F? Would they be limited to the
"PM=none" case?
Is this the right place or way to ask such questions, or to
get information?
In asking a similar information question, it seems that it
was preferred that a bug be filed. Is that the case here?
Thanks,
Lin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-11-18 22:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-18 22:46 Config Q?: Preempt Model & Preempt Big Kern Lock Linda Walsh
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.