* [uml-devel] uml FB
@ 2007-12-02 14:50 Antoine Martin
2007-12-03 9:38 ` Gerd Hoffmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Martin @ 2007-12-02 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: User-mode Linux Kernel Development; +Cc: Gerd Knorr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Been looking at the uml-x11-fb patch again.
It still does apply more or less cleanly, but won't build (can't get
Kbuild to play nice) and I was thinking: wouldn't it be easier to just
drop all the X11 stuff and have just a plain in-memory VESA type of
framebuffer in the guest (straightforward contiguous memory region).
This would allow the guest to have a framebuffer and if we need to
actually see its contents, it could easily be exposed using shared
memory. This would completely de-couple the framebuffer from the host,
allowing us to attach/detach as needed: start session, detach, log out
of X, log in, attach to guest framebuffer (although this doesn't address
the mouse/keyboard issue).
Is this (easily) feasable at all?
Thanks
Antoine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHUsYmGK2zHPGK1rsRCpt9AJ40otwE6ziQDIpR6u0/ImQYFsFcegCfe5Jw
Q6XhYv6RkGb11AVZ/aZBB5c=
=xdpn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [uml-devel] uml FB
2007-12-02 14:50 [uml-devel] uml FB Antoine Martin
@ 2007-12-03 9:38 ` Gerd Hoffmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gerd Hoffmann @ 2007-12-03 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antoine Martin; +Cc: User-mode Linux Kernel Development
Antoine Martin wrote:
> This would allow the guest to have a framebuffer and if we need to
> actually see its contents, it could easily be exposed using shared
> memory. This would completely de-couple the framebuffer from the host,
> allowing us to attach/detach as needed: start session, detach, log out
> of X, log in, attach to guest framebuffer (although this doesn't address
> the mouse/keyboard issue).
Havn't looked at it for ages. Should be doable though. Note just some
shared memory area isn't enougth, you need also some channel for screen
updates (guest->host) and mouse/kbd events (host->guest). One possible
approach would be coding up a vnc server, so you can use any vnc client
to see the uml framebuffer and talk to the virtual machine. This would
also allow remote access to the display. uml-x11-fb never worked with a
remote display, probably because it grooks when it can't write to the
X11 socket buffer, which quickly happens without the MIT-SHM extention.
cheers,
Gerd
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-03 9:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-02 14:50 [uml-devel] uml FB Antoine Martin
2007-12-03 9:38 ` Gerd Hoffmann
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.