From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/autofs: Use time_before, time_before_eq, etc.
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 12:45:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4772BD6C.1010502@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c0942db0712261158q34cddebeifceef6ceda683320@mail.gmail.com>
Ray Lee wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2007 7:21 AM, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> wrote:
>> - if (jiffies - ent->last_usage < timeout)
>> + if (time_before(jiffies, ent->last_usage + timeout))
>
> I don't think this is a safe change? subtraction is always safe (if
> you think about it as 'distance'), addition isn't always safe unless
> you know the range. The time_before macro will expand that out to
> (effectively):
>
> if ( (long)(ent->last_usage + timeout) - (long)(jiffies) < 0 )
>
> which seems to introduce an overflow condition in the first term.
>
> Dunno, I may be wrong (happens often), but at the very least what
> you've transformed it into is no longer obviously correct, and so it's
> not a great change.
Indeed. The bottom form will have overflow issues at time
jiffies_wraparound/2, whereas the top form will have overflow issues
only near jiffies_wraparound/1.
-hpa
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/autofs: Use time_before, time_before_eq, etc.
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:45:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4772BD6C.1010502@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c0942db0712261158q34cddebeifceef6ceda683320@mail.gmail.com>
Ray Lee wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2007 7:21 AM, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> wrote:
>> - if (jiffies - ent->last_usage < timeout)
>> + if (time_before(jiffies, ent->last_usage + timeout))
>
> I don't think this is a safe change? subtraction is always safe (if
> you think about it as 'distance'), addition isn't always safe unless
> you know the range. The time_before macro will expand that out to
> (effectively):
>
> if ( (long)(ent->last_usage + timeout) - (long)(jiffies) < 0 )
>
> which seems to introduce an overflow condition in the first term.
>
> Dunno, I may be wrong (happens often), but at the very least what
> you've transformed it into is no longer obviously correct, and so it's
> not a great change.
Indeed. The bottom form will have overflow issues at time
jiffies_wraparound/2, whereas the top form will have overflow issues
only near jiffies_wraparound/1.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-26 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-26 15:21 [PATCH 1/4] fs/autofs: Use time_before, time_before_eq, etc Julia Lawall
2007-12-26 15:21 ` Julia Lawall
2007-12-26 17:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-26 17:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-26 19:19 ` Julia Lawall
2007-12-26 19:19 ` Julia Lawall
2007-12-26 19:58 ` Ray Lee
2007-12-26 19:58 ` Ray Lee
2007-12-26 20:45 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-12-26 20:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-27 7:08 ` Julia Lawall
2007-12-27 7:08 ` Julia Lawall
2007-12-28 1:39 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2007-12-28 1:39 `
2007-12-28 4:34 ` Ian Kent
2007-12-28 4:34 ` [autofs] " Ian Kent
2007-12-28 4:34 ` [autofs] [PATCH 1/4] fs/autofs: Use time_before, Ian Kent
2007-12-28 9:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] fs/autofs: Use time_before, time_before_eq, etc Julia Lawall
2007-12-28 9:27 ` Julia Lawall
2007-12-28 14:21 ` [autofs] " Fabio Olive Leite
2007-12-28 14:21 ` Fabio Olive Leite
2007-12-28 14:21 ` Fabio Olive Leite
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4772BD6C.1010502@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.