All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* kernel-source required?
@ 2008-01-09 17:30 Jan Engelhardt
  2008-01-10  9:22 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
       [not found] ` <200801100922.m0A9MW2Z011677@toshiba.co.jp>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2008-01-09 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kaber; +Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List

Hi,


just now as an IRC user posted about a compilation error, the only 
situation that I could think of to load to this error was a missing 
kernel source tree.
Since many Xtables header files are copied to the iptables source tree, 
yet `make KERNEL_DIR=somethinginvalid` gives a compiler error because it 
cannot find <linux/compiler.h> (required by ip_tables.h).

So I wonder, do we actually support building iptables without a 
kernel source tree?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: kernel-source required?
  2008-01-09 17:30 kernel-source required? Jan Engelhardt
@ 2008-01-10  9:22 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
       [not found] ` <200801100922.m0A9MW2Z011677@toshiba.co.jp>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI @ 2008-01-10  9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jengelh; +Cc: kaber, netfilter-devel

From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:30:36 +0100 (CET)

> just now as an IRC user posted about a compilation error, the only 
> situation that I could think of to load to this error was a missing 
> kernel source tree.
> Since many Xtables header files are copied to the iptables source tree, 
> yet `make KERNEL_DIR=somethinginvalid` gives a compiler error because it 
> cannot find <linux/compiler.h> (required by ip_tables.h).

I wonder why recent (at least, Fedora Core 7) distributed kernel header
package for user programs does not include /usr/include/linux/compiler.h .

> So I wonder, do we actually support building iptables without a 
> kernel source tree?

I prefer to keep people easy to try newer iptables as possible.
We can add include/linux/compiler.h to iptables or remove __user, etc. from
headers of iptables.

-- Yasuyuki Kozakai

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: kernel-source required?
       [not found] ` <200801100922.m0A9MW2Z011677@toshiba.co.jp>
@ 2008-01-10 15:50   ` Patrick McHardy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2008-01-10 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI; +Cc: jengelh, netfilter-devel

Yasuyuki KOZAKAI wrote:
> From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:30:36 +0100 (CET)
> 
>> just now as an IRC user posted about a compilation error, the only 
>> situation that I could think of to load to this error was a missing 
>> kernel source tree.
>> Since many Xtables header files are copied to the iptables source tree, 
>> yet `make KERNEL_DIR=somethinginvalid` gives a compiler error because it 
>> cannot find <linux/compiler.h> (required by ip_tables.h).
> 
> I wonder why recent (at least, Fedora Core 7) distributed kernel header
> package for user programs does not include /usr/include/linux/compiler.h .

Debian doesn't have it either.

>> So I wonder, do we actually support building iptables without a 
>> kernel source tree?
> 
> I prefer to keep people easy to try newer iptables as possible.
> We can add include/linux/compiler.h to iptables or remove __user, etc. from
> headers of iptables.

Or simply define the missing annotations in xtables.h.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-10 15:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-09 17:30 kernel-source required? Jan Engelhardt
2008-01-10  9:22 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
     [not found] ` <200801100922.m0A9MW2Z011677@toshiba.co.jp>
2008-01-10 15:50   ` Patrick McHardy

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.