From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, hadi@cyberus.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:38:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <478F05E7.6070503@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080116.231654.74131878.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote:
> From: Timo_Teräs <timo.teras@iki.fi>
> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:27:14 +0200
>
>> I don't know about netlink. But pfkey works in *BSD too and it is RFC'd.
>> So I'd say pfkey might be a bit more portable. Though netlink is definitely
>> more robust and extensive.
>
> The RFCs say absolutely nothing about policy interfaces for AF_KEY,
> everybody rolls their own in slightly incompatible ways.
>
> It is therefore anything but standardized.
Yes, there's non-standardized extensions. But the point was that there are
other implementations of pfkey. And ipsec-tools racoon is an example of
a widely used application that runs in Linux and *BSD using this API. So
for the time being I'd consider having pfkey fixes as a good thing. This
pfkey dumping problem seems to be affecting many users.
- Timo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-17 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-13 12:26 [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key Timo Teräs
2008-01-16 13:52 ` jamal
2008-01-16 14:28 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 1:25 ` jamal
2008-01-16 22:58 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 1:39 ` jamal
2008-01-17 2:17 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 5:54 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 11:11 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 12:21 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 12:26 ` jamal
2008-01-17 12:42 ` jamal
2008-01-17 12:50 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 13:18 ` jamal
2008-01-17 13:31 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 21:34 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-18 6:45 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-18 14:08 ` jamal
2008-01-17 6:27 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 7:16 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 7:38 ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2008-01-17 7:59 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 8:11 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 8:49 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 9:20 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 9:31 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 9:38 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 9:44 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 10:01 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 10:06 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 11:00 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 11:08 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 12:37 ` Timo Teräs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=478F05E7.6070503@iki.fi \
--to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.