* Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Fixup NR-CPUS patch for numa
@ 2008-01-17 18:30 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-01-17 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: travis
Cc: Andi Kleen, mingo, Eric Dumazet, Christoph Lameter, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:34:39 -0800 travis@sgi.com wrote:
> This patch removes the EXPORT_SYMBOL for:
>
> x86_cpu_to_node_map_init
> x86_cpu_to_node_map_early_ptr
>
> ... thus fixing the section mismatch problem.
Which section mismatch problem? Please always quote the error message when
fixing things like this.
> Also, the mem -> node hash lookup is fixed.
>
> Based on 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 + change-NR_CPUS-V3 patchset
>
hm, I've been hiding from those patches.
Are they ready?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Fixup NR-CPUS patch for numa
2008-01-17 18:30 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2008-01-17 18:51 ` Mike Travis
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2008-01-17 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Andi Kleen, mingo, Eric Dumazet, Christoph Lameter, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:34:39 -0800 travis@sgi.com wrote:
>
>> This patch removes the EXPORT_SYMBOL for:
>>
>> x86_cpu_to_node_map_init
>> x86_cpu_to_node_map_early_ptr
>>
>> ... thus fixing the section mismatch problem.
>
> Which section mismatch problem? Please always quote the error message when
> fixing things like this.
Will do. Basically, it's the error that caused you to add
arch-x86-mm-numa_64c-section-fix.patch
>
>> Also, the mem -> node hash lookup is fixed.
>>
>> Based on 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 + change-NR_CPUS-V3 patchset
>>
>
> hm, I've been hiding from those patches.
>
> Are they ready?
Please wait a moment. I'm resolving the conflicts between what's
in 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 and what's not. I'll resubmit everything shortly.
Thanks!
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Fixup NR-CPUS patch for numa
@ 2008-01-17 18:51 ` Mike Travis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mike Travis @ 2008-01-17 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Andi Kleen, mingo, Eric Dumazet, Christoph Lameter, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:34:39 -0800 travis@sgi.com wrote:
>
>> This patch removes the EXPORT_SYMBOL for:
>>
>> x86_cpu_to_node_map_init
>> x86_cpu_to_node_map_early_ptr
>>
>> ... thus fixing the section mismatch problem.
>
> Which section mismatch problem? Please always quote the error message when
> fixing things like this.
Will do. Basically, it's the error that caused you to add
arch-x86-mm-numa_64c-section-fix.patch
>
>> Also, the mem -> node hash lookup is fixed.
>>
>> Based on 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 + change-NR_CPUS-V3 patchset
>>
>
> hm, I've been hiding from those patches.
>
> Are they ready?
Please wait a moment. I'm resolving the conflicts between what's
in 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 and what's not. I'll resubmit everything shortly.
Thanks!
Mike
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Fixup NR-CPUS patch for numa
2008-01-17 18:30 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2008-01-18 12:08 ` Ingo Molnar
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-01-18 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: travis, Andi Kleen, Eric Dumazet, Christoph Lameter, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > Also, the mem -> node hash lookup is fixed.
> >
> > Based on 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 + change-NR_CPUS-V3 patchset
>
> hm, I've been hiding from those patches.
>
> Are they ready?
i'm carrying them in x86.git, and they are pretty robust, with one
outstanding build failure.
( and i've asked Mike for a CONFIG_SMP_MAX debug option that selects the
baddest high-end features we have with 1024 or 4096 CPUs, etc. - this
way allyesconfig bootups will show us any problems on that scale of
the spectrum. )
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Fixup NR-CPUS patch for numa
@ 2008-01-18 12:08 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-01-18 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: travis, Andi Kleen, Eric Dumazet, Christoph Lameter, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > Also, the mem -> node hash lookup is fixed.
> >
> > Based on 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 + change-NR_CPUS-V3 patchset
>
> hm, I've been hiding from those patches.
>
> Are they ready?
i'm carrying them in x86.git, and they are pretty robust, with one
outstanding build failure.
( and i've asked Mike for a CONFIG_SMP_MAX debug option that selects the
baddest high-end features we have with 1024 or 4096 CPUs, etc. - this
way allyesconfig bootups will show us any problems on that scale of
the spectrum. )
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread