* [LARTC] Choosing a qlen?
@ 2008-01-22 9:50 Simon Tennant
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Simon Tennant @ 2008-01-22 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 762 bytes --]
qlen must be the worst term to search for on the internet: the results
show endless ifconfig output.
I am trying to work out the optimal qlen for:
* ADSL outbound
* wireless outbound.
My current understanding is that it is the buffer in the kernel before
the packets hit the buffer on the ethernet card. So a nice fat qlen
should allow better traffic prioritisation? Or am I misguided?
If it helps, I'm trying to prioritise traffic and reduce jitter between
my asterisk box on the internet and my wifi voip fone hanging off an
internal subnet.
S.
--
Simon Tennant _____________________________________________
fixed: .uk +44 20 7043 6756 .de +49 89 420 955 854
mob: .uk +44 79 6096 6249 .de +49 17 8545 0880
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-01-22 9:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-22 9:50 [LARTC] Choosing a qlen? Simon Tennant
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.