From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
"Kernel, Linux" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] [POWERPC] 8xx cleanups
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:31:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47977A02.40506@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080123171252.GA22967@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> What impact do the have on boards in arch/ppc being able to build?
>
> Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
> We have:
> arch/ppc
> arch/ppc64
> arch/powerpc
>
> It was my understanding that arch/powerpc was supposed
> to be the future unified powerpc architecture but it
> does not even provide a defconfig.
>
> And I do not see too much happening to do so - but that maybe
> because I looked at a wrong place.
You must have looked in the wrong place. :-)
arch/ppc is scheduled for removal from mainline in June.
arch/powerpc is under significant development, with lots
of defconfigs in arch/powerpc/configs.
arch/ppc64 is long dead.
jdl
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
"Kernel, Linux" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] [POWERPC] 8xx cleanups
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:31:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47977A02.40506@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080123171252.GA22967@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> What impact do the have on boards in arch/ppc being able to build?
>
> Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
> We have:
> arch/ppc
> arch/ppc64
> arch/powerpc
>
> It was my understanding that arch/powerpc was supposed
> to be the future unified powerpc architecture but it
> does not even provide a defconfig.
>
> And I do not see too much happening to do so - but that maybe
> because I looked at a wrong place.
You must have looked in the wrong place. :-)
arch/ppc is scheduled for removal from mainline in June.
arch/powerpc is under significant development, with lots
of defconfigs in arch/powerpc/configs.
arch/ppc64 is long dead.
jdl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-23 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-23 15:58 [PATCHv2 0/8] [POWERPC] 8xx cleanups Jochen Friedrich
2008-01-23 15:58 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-01-23 16:11 ` Kumar Gala
2008-01-23 16:11 ` Kumar Gala
2008-01-23 17:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-23 17:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-23 17:31 ` Jon Loeliger [this message]
2008-01-23 17:31 ` Jon Loeliger
2008-01-23 18:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-23 18:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-23 19:35 ` Josh Boyer
2008-01-23 19:35 ` Josh Boyer
2008-01-23 20:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-01-23 20:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47977A02.40506@freescale.com \
--to=jdl@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.