[PATCH -mm] fix variable use in AVR32 pte_alloc_one

[PATCH -mm] fix variable use in AVR32 pte_alloc_one

[Ben Nizette]

Some parts of this function use 'page', some 'pte'.  As such, an AVR32
-mm build fails with an undefined reference to 'page'.

Signed-Off-By: Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com>

---
Index: linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/include/asm-avr32/pgalloc.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1.orig/include/asm-avr32/pgalloc.h
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/include/asm-avr32/pgalloc.h
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ static inline struct page *pte_alloc_one
 	struct page *pte;
 
 	pte = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT | __GFP_ZERO);
-	if (!page)
+	if (!pte)
 		return NULL;
-	pgtable_page_ctor(page);
+	pgtable_page_ctor(pte);
 	return pte;
 }
 

Re: [PATCH -mm] fix variable use in AVR32 pte_alloc_one

[Haavard Skinnemoen]

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:57:34 +1100
Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com> wrote:

> 
> Some parts of this function use 'page', some 'pte'.  As such, an AVR32
> -mm build fails with an undefined reference to 'page'.
> 
> Signed-Off-By: Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com>
> 
> ---
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/include/asm-avr32/pgalloc.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1.orig/include/asm-avr32/pgalloc.h
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/include/asm-avr32/pgalloc.h
> @@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ static inline struct page *pte_alloc_one
>  	struct page *pte;
>  
>  	pte = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT | __GFP_ZERO);
> -	if (!page)
> +	if (!pte)
>  		return NULL;
> -	pgtable_page_ctor(page);
> +	pgtable_page_ctor(pte);
>  	return pte;
>  }

Hmm...I can't see anything like this on my current avr32-arch branch,
but I think I mistakenly pushed out some unfinished code about a week
ago and rewound it shortly afterwards. If Andrew pulled during that
window, I guess it must have made it into -mm :-(

But thanks for testing and for providing a fix. I'll check the code
that I was working on and apply the patch if it's still broken.

Haavard

Re: [PATCH -mm] fix variable use in AVR32 pte_alloc_one

[Ben Nizette]

Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> 
> Hmm...I can't see anything like this on my current avr32-arch branch,
> but I think I mistakenly pushed out some unfinished code about a week
> ago and rewound it shortly afterwards. If Andrew pulled during that
> window, I guess it must have made it into -mm :-(
> 
> But thanks for testing and for providing a fix. I'll check the code
> that I was working on and apply the patch if it's still broken.
> 

Cool, np.  FWIW I'm trying to get -mm to fly on AVR32 so I have access 
to the latest gpiolib stuff.  Despite this patch and "[PATCH -mm] define 
empty unxlate_dev_mem_ptr on AVR32" the build still fails due to some 
timerfd syscall horkenation.  Shall look in to that this arvo too.

> Haavard
> --

--Ben.

[PATCH -mm] Fix timerfd breakage on avr32 (was Re: [PATCH -mm] fix variable use in AVR32 pte_alloc_one)

[Haavard Skinnemoen]

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:32:38 +1100
Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com> wrote:

> Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > 
> > Hmm...I can't see anything like this on my current avr32-arch branch,
> > but I think I mistakenly pushed out some unfinished code about a week
> > ago and rewound it shortly afterwards. If Andrew pulled during that
> > window, I guess it must have made it into -mm :-(
> > 
> > But thanks for testing and for providing a fix. I'll check the code
> > that I was working on and apply the patch if it's still broken.
> >   
> 
> Cool, np.  FWIW I'm trying to get -mm to fly on AVR32 so I have access 
> to the latest gpiolib stuff.  Despite this patch and "[PATCH -mm] define 
> empty unxlate_dev_mem_ptr on AVR32" the build still fails due to some 
> timerfd syscall horkenation.  Shall look in to that this arvo too.

Hmm. Someone removed the timerfd() syscall...

---
 arch/avr32/kernel/syscall_table.S |    2 +-
 include/asm-avr32/unistd.h        |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/arch/avr32/kernel/syscall_table.S
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1.orig/arch/avr32/kernel/syscall_table.S	2008-01-24 12:58:10.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/arch/avr32/kernel/syscall_table.S	2008-01-24 12:58:38.000000000 +0100
@@ -293,6 +293,6 @@ sys_call_table:
 	.long	sys_shmctl
 	.long	sys_utimensat
 	.long	sys_signalfd
-	.long	sys_timerfd		/* 280 */
+	.long	sys_ni_syscall		/* 280, was sys_timerfd */
 	.long	sys_eventfd
 	.long	sys_ni_syscall		/* r8 is saturated at nr_syscalls */
Index: linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/include/asm-avr32/unistd.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1.orig/include/asm-avr32/unistd.h	2008-01-24 12:58:48.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/include/asm-avr32/unistd.h	2008-01-24 12:59:25.000000000 +0100
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@
 
 #define __NR_utimensat		278
 #define __NR_signalfd		279
-#define __NR_timerfd		280
+/* 280 was __NR_timerfd */
 #define __NR_eventfd		281
 
 #ifdef __KERNEL__

Re: [PATCH -mm] fix variable use in AVR32 pte_alloc_one

[Andrew Morton]

> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:20:10 +0100 Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:57:34 +1100
> Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Some parts of this function use 'page', some 'pte'.  As such, an AVR32
> > -mm build fails with an undefined reference to 'page'.
> > 
> > Signed-Off-By: Ben Nizette <bn@niasdigital.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > Index: linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/include/asm-avr32/pgalloc.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1.orig/include/asm-avr32/pgalloc.h
> > +++ linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/include/asm-avr32/pgalloc.h
> > @@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ static inline struct page *pte_alloc_one
> >  	struct page *pte;
> >  
> >  	pte = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT | __GFP_ZERO);
> > -	if (!page)
> > +	if (!pte)
> >  		return NULL;
> > -	pgtable_page_ctor(page);
> > +	pgtable_page_ctor(pte);
> >  	return pte;
> >  }
> 
> Hmm...I can't see anything like this on my current avr32-arch branch,
> but I think I mistakenly pushed out some unfinished code about a week
> ago and rewound it shortly afterwards. If Andrew pulled during that
> window, I guess it must have made it into -mm :-(
> 
> But thanks for testing and for providing a fix. I'll check the code
> that I was working on and apply the patch if it's still broken.
> 

This bustage was added by the -mm-only
config_highpte-vs-sub-page-page-tables.patch

Thanks for the fix.