All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: ignore spurious faults
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:26:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4797DB37.5040507@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201133916.16972.124.camel@brick>

Harvey Harrison wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:05 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>   
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
>> @@ -290,6 +290,53 @@ static int is_errata93(struct pt_regs *r
>>  
>>
>>  /*
>> + * Handle a spurious fault caused by a stale TLB entry.  This allows
>> + * us to lazily refresh the TLB when increasing the permissions of a
>> + * kernel page (RO -> RW or NX -> X).  Doing it eagerly is very
>> + * expensive since that implies doing a full cross-processor TLB
>> + * flush, even if no stale TLB entries exist on other processors.
>> + * There are no security implications to leaving a stale TLB when
>> + * increasing the permissions on a page.
>> + */
>> +static int spurious_fault(unsigned long address,
>> +			  unsigned long error_code)
>> +{
>> +	pgd_t *pgd;
>> +	pud_t *pud;
>> +	pmd_t *pmd;
>> +	pte_t *pte;
>> +
>> +	/* Reserved-bit violation or user access to kernel space? */
>> +	if (error_code & (PF_USER | PF_RSVD))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	pgd = init_mm.pgd + pgd_index(address);
>> +	if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	pud = pud_offset(pgd, address);
>> +	if (!pud_present(*pud))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
>> +	if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address);
>> +	if (!pte_present(*pte))
>> +		return 0;
>> +	if ((error_code & 0x02) && !pte_write(*pte))
>> +		return 0;
>>     
>
> 	if ((error_code & PF_WRITE) && !pte_write(*pte))
> 		return 0;
>   

Oops, thanks.  Overlooked that one.

> How about dropping the #if and rely on the !pte_exec() test always
> being false when _PAGE_NX = 0?  The compiler should just trim this
> all away.
>
> from pgtable.h:
>
> static inline int pte_exec(pte_t pte)           { return !(pte_val(pte)
> & _PAGE_NX); }
>   

Thanks for reminding me; I thought of this the other day, but forgot to 
do it.  Will post an updated patch shortly.

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-24  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-24  0:05 [PATCH] x86: ignore spurious faults Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-24  0:18 ` Harvey Harrison
2008-01-24  0:26   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-01-24  0:28   ` [PATCH UPDATE] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-24 19:14     ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-24 19:21       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-24 23:41         ` Nick Piggin
2008-01-25  0:26           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-25  7:36             ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-25  8:15               ` Jan Beulich
2008-01-25  8:38                 ` Nick Piggin
2008-01-25  9:11                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-25  9:18                     ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-25  9:51                       ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-25 10:19                       ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-25 13:17                         ` Keir Fraser
2008-01-25  9:18                   ` Jan Beulich
2008-01-25 15:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-25 15:54       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-25 18:08         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-25 18:39           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-24  6:49 ` [PATCH] " Andi Kleen
2008-01-24  7:02   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-24  7:11     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4797DB37.5040507@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.