All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, kernel-team@fb.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
	clm@meta.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/10] bpf: Record each half of a paired return value in verifier diagnostics
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 10:08:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47991bc5-5f31-4cf0-a979-245e75d6bad7@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0406cb29c1419b2bdf8ab69ca7c14ffe6a5dacde23a387b9b43071e6017cf423@mail.kernel.org>



On 8/25/26 2:59 PM, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> index e036ae20bf6b9..9aa29c3670087 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> @@ -10403,10 +10403,14 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
>>   		 * return to the caller whatever the callee had in the
>>   		 * return register(s)
>>   		 */
>> -		bpf_diag_mod_begin(env, &caller->regs[BPF_REG_0], r0, BPF_DIAG_MOD_WRITE);
>> -		for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++)
>> -			caller->regs[ret_regs[i]] = callee->regs[ret_regs[i]];
>> -		bpf_diag_mod_end(env);
>> +		for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++) {
>> +			u32 regno = ret_regs[i];
>> +
>> +			bpf_diag_mod_begin(env, &caller->regs[regno], &callee->regs[regno],
>> +					   BPF_DIAG_MOD_WRITE);
>> +			caller->regs[regno] = callee->regs[regno];
>> +			bpf_diag_mod_end(env);
>> +		}
>>   	}
>>
>>   	/* for callbacks like bpf_loop or bpf_for_each_map_elem go back to callsite,
> This fix looks correct for prepare_func_exit(). Should check_func_call()
> and check_kfunc_call() get the same per-return-register diagnostic scope,
> or is R2 intentionally left out there?
>
> Commit 0630ad00d96d introduced the same pattern in three places, and this
> patch addresses only prepare_func_exit().
>
> In check_func_call(), the global-subprog path has:
>
>      bpf_diag_mod_begin(env, &caller->regs[BPF_REG_0], NULL, BPF_DIAG_MOD_WRITE);
>      ...
>      nregs = bpf_ret_reg_pair(env, subprog) ? 2 : 1;
>      for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++)
>              mark_reg_unknown(env, caller->regs, ret_regs[i]);
>      bpf_diag_mod_end(env);
>
> When nregs is 2, mark_reg_unknown() writes into caller->regs[BPF_REG_2],
> but the scope target is caller->regs[BPF_REG_0], so the write emits no
> BPF_DIAG_HISTORY_MOD event.
>
> Similarly in check_kfunc_call():
>
>      bpf_diag_mod_begin(env, &regs[BPF_REG_0], NULL, BPF_DIAG_MOD_WRITE);
>      ...
>      mark_kfunc_ret_regs(env, regs, t->size);   /* writes R0 and, for 8 < size <= 16, R2 */
>      ...
>      bpf_diag_mod_end(env);
>
> When t->size is between 8 and 16 bytes, mark_kfunc_ret_regs() writes the
> second half into R2, but again with no MOD event.
>
> In both cases R2 does get a BPF_DIAG_MOD_CALLER_SAVED scrub record, so
> the history shows R2 as clobbered by the call but never shows it being
> written with the second half of the return value.

Yes, I need to add these two cases for bpf_diag_mod.

>
>
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/32899532405


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-26 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25 20:54 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/10] bpf: Allow arena pointers in by-value returns Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 20:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/10] bpf: Record each half of a paired return value in verifier diagnostics Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 21:59   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-26 17:08     ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-08-25 20:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/10] bpf: Drop the recursion depth argument of btf_type_is_scalar_struct() Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 20:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/10] bpf: Add btf_type_is_arena_ptr() Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 21:59   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-26 17:28     ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 20:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/10] bpf: Let the by-value struct walk take the kinds of member it accepts Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 21:59   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-26 17:39     ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 20:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/10] bpf: Report which member makes a kfunc return type unsupported Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 21:59   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-26 17:59     ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 20:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/10] bpf: Allow a global function to return arena pointers by value Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 21:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 18:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 20:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/10] bpf: Allow arena pointers in a by-value kfunc return Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 22:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-26 18:57     ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 20:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/10] selftests/bpf: Check the member named for an unsupported kfunc return type Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 20:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/10] selftests/bpf: Test global functions returning arena pointers by value Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 21:59   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-27  3:46     ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 20:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/10] selftests/bpf: Test kfuncs " Yonghong Song
2026-08-25 21:59   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-27  3:58     ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47991bc5-5f31-4cf0-a979-245e75d6bad7@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.