All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	kvm-devel
	<kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Merging KVM QEMU changes upstream
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:53:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <479A222E.4@us.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi,

As most probably know, the KVM project has been maintaining a QEMU tree 
for some time now.  Beyond support for the KVM kernel interface, the 
tree also contains a number of useful features like live migration, 
virtio, and extboot.  Some of these things have been posted to 
qemu-devel already but were not included.

I would like to work on merging the KVM changes into upstream QEMU but 
before I started that work, I wanted to get a read on how difficult it 
would be.  A lot of these things were designed specifically for KVM on 
x86.  Only now are other architectures starting to be considered.  
Certainly, cross-architecture emulation hasn't really been considered.

I wouldn't expect anything to be merged that caused a regression for 
cross-architecture emulation, but I don't really have the time to get a 
lot of the new features working for the cross-architecture case.  I 
would expect, though, that if these things were merged, it would make it 
relatively easy for someone else to do that though.

Is this a reasonable merge strategy?  We won't introduce regressions but 
I can't guarantee these new things will work cross-architecture.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Merging KVM QEMU changes upstream
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:53:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <479A222E.4@us.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi,

As most probably know, the KVM project has been maintaining a QEMU tree 
for some time now.  Beyond support for the KVM kernel interface, the 
tree also contains a number of useful features like live migration, 
virtio, and extboot.  Some of these things have been posted to 
qemu-devel already but were not included.

I would like to work on merging the KVM changes into upstream QEMU but 
before I started that work, I wanted to get a read on how difficult it 
would be.  A lot of these things were designed specifically for KVM on 
x86.  Only now are other architectures starting to be considered.  
Certainly, cross-architecture emulation hasn't really been considered.

I wouldn't expect anything to be merged that caused a regression for 
cross-architecture emulation, but I don't really have the time to get a 
lot of the new features working for the cross-architecture case.  I 
would expect, though, that if these things were merged, it would make it 
relatively easy for someone else to do that though.

Is this a reasonable merge strategy?  We won't introduce regressions but 
I can't guarantee these new things will work cross-architecture.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

             reply	other threads:[~2008-01-25 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-25 17:53 Anthony Liguori [this message]
2008-01-25 17:53 ` [Qemu-devel] Merging KVM QEMU changes upstream Anthony Liguori
     [not found] ` <479A222E.4-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-01-25 18:43   ` Paul Brook
2008-01-25 18:43     ` Paul Brook
     [not found]     ` <200801251843.37551.paul-qD8j1LwMmJjtCj0u4l0SBw@public.gmane.org>
2008-01-25 18:50       ` Anthony Liguori
2008-01-25 18:50         ` [kvm-devel] " Anthony Liguori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=479A222E.4@us.ibm.com \
    --to=aliguori-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.