* Re: irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
@ 2008-01-27 20:07 Gunnar Zarncke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gunnar Zarncke @ 2008-01-27 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Hi,
I know it's a time since this question was posted and treated the last
time, but I have quite the same problem, only its IRQ #18 and some other
pci devices, but it's also a dom-u ("asterisk") with some devices moved
there 2xISDN and 1 soundcard. The problem halts the whole system (also
the dom-0 ("powerless")), hard reboot is needed. This happens some hours
after the dom-u (asterisk) is started. I'm right now trying the
noirqdebug workaround.
I think this occors since I move the soundcard into the asterisk
dom-u. I'd really be happy to keep it in the dom-0, but I don't see a
way to let the dom-u access it. I couldn't find a virtual sound card for
xen.
I would be grateful for any help.
Gunnar Zarncke
Debug data:
powerless:~# uname -a
Linux powerless 2.6.18-4-xen-686 #1 SMP Thu May 10 03:24:35 UTC 2007
i686 GNU/Li
powerless:~# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
1: 397 Phys-irq i8042
7: 0 Phys-irq parport0
8: 1 Phys-irq rtc
9: 0 Phys-irq acpi
14: 129799 Phys-irq ide0
18: 137 Phys-irq ohci_hcd:usb1
19: 36296 Phys-irq ohci_hcd:usb3, ohci_hcd:usb5, eth1
20: 39757 Phys-irq ehci_hcd:usb6, eth2
21: 229 Phys-irq libata
22: 0 Phys-irq ohci_hcd:usb2, ohci_hcd:usb4
256: 2114450 Dynamic-irq timer0
257: 0 Dynamic-irq resched0
258: 0 Dynamic-irq callfunc0
259: 4449 Dynamic-irq xenbus
260: 205 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend
261: 7596 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend
262: 30 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend
263: 22089 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend
264: 12909 Dynamic-irq vif2.0
265: 12000 Dynamic-irq vif2.1
266: 1 Dynamic-irq vif2.2
267: 423 Dynamic-irq pciback
268: 698 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend
269: 21 Dynamic-irq blkif-backend
270: 53 Dynamic-irq vif3.0
NMI: 0
LOC: 0
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
asterisk:~# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
16: 21 Phys-irq zaphfc
17: 1 Phys-irq zaphfc
18: 93 Phys-irq HDA Intel
256: 1779 Dynamic-irq timer0
257: 0 Dynamic-irq resched0
258: 0 Dynamic-irq callfunc0
259: 463 Dynamic-irq xenbus
260: 114 Dynamic-irq xencons
261: 1276 Dynamic-irq blkif
262: 20 Dynamic-irq blkif
263: 98 Dynamic-irq eth0
NMI: 0
LOC: 0
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
from dmesg:
pciback: vpci: 0000:04:05.0: assign to virtual slot 0
pciback: vpci: 0000:04:06.0: assign to virtual slot 1
pciback: vpci: 0000:00:14.2: assign to virtual slot 2
[...]
pciback 0000:00:14.2: Driver tried to write to a read-only configuration
space field at offset 0x54, size 2. This may be harmless, but if you
have problems with your device:
1) see permissive attribute in sysfs
2) report problems to the xen-devel mailing list along with details of
your device obtained from lspci.
PCI: Enabling device 0000:00:14.2 (0000 -> 0002)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:14.2[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
pciback 0000:04:05.0: Driver tried to write to a read-only configuration
space field at offset 0x44, size 2. This may be harmless, but if you
have problems with your device:
1) see permissive attribute in sysfs
2) report problems to the xen-devel mailing list along with details of
your device obtained from lspci.
PCI: Enabling device 0000:04:05.0 (0000 -> 0003)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:04:05.0[A] -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
pciback 0000:04:06.0: Driver tried to write to a read-only configuration
space field at offset 0x44, size 2. This may be harmless, but if you
have problems with your device:
1) see permissive attribute in sysfs
2) report problems to the xen-devel mailing list along with details of
your device obtained from lspci.
PCI: Enabling device 0000:04:06.0 (0000 -> 0003)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:04:06.0[A] -> GSI 21 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
--
mailto:gunnar.zarncke@gmx.de
http://gunnar.zarncke.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
@ 2008-10-18 0:02 Justin Mattock
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Justin Mattock @ 2008-10-18 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
I'm not sure if this is to blame, or something else
I've applied a patch for 2.6.27 from:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
and later atheros gave a response like this:
[ 433.706892] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[ 433.706909] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-04845-g742a691 #41
[ 433.706912] Call Trace:
[ 433.706919] [<c0153f94>] __report_bad_irq+0x2e/0x6f
[ 433.706922] [<c015419a>] note_interrupt+0x1c5/0x217
[ 433.706926] [<c01536fc>] ? handle_IRQ_event+0x2a/0x5a
[ 433.706929] [<c015474e>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x91/0xb6
[ 433.706933] [<c0104ca1>] do_IRQ+0x6c/0x87
[ 433.706936] [<c0103c2b>] common_interrupt+0x23/0x28
[ 433.706954] [<f803769f>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x306/0x392 [processor]
[ 433.706959] [<c02f5d02>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x62/0x92
[ 433.706962] [<c010227d>] cpu_idle+0x74/0x8f
[ 433.706966] [<c039fde2>] rest_init+0x4e/0x50
[ 433.706968] handlers:
[ 433.706969] [<f83de780>] (ath_isr+0x0/0x13a [ath9k])
[ 433.706985] Disabling IRQ #17
I've seen this twice usually If I let NetworkManager
connect, and not google or stream the radio.
--
Justin P. Mattock
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
@ 2006-06-03 12:51 Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-04 0:48 ` Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-04 8:03 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans-Christian Armingeon @ 2006-06-03 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: xen-users
Hi,
I am running
xen unstable hg from 2006-06-03
2.6.16.19 pathced with xen unstable hg from 2006-06-02
I get this error message.
[ 1199.028108] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[ 1199.031054]
[ 1199.031055] Call Trace: <IRQ> <ffffffff8014d754>{__report_bad_irq+48}
[ 1199.034294] <ffffffff8014d9bc>{note_interrupt+539} <ffffffff8014d2ab>{__do_IRQ+190}
[ 1199.040504] <ffffffff8010c934>{do_IRQ+62} <ffffffff802d0034>{evtchn_do_upcall+132}
[ 1199.046403] <ffffffff8010b152>{do_hypervisor_callback+30} <EOI>
[ 1199.052363] handlers:
[ 1199.055141] [<ffffffff880354ab>] (ata_interrupt+0x0/0x166 [libata])
[ 1199.058267] Disabling IRQ #17
So I rebooted with irqpoll option.
Is this a bug, or what's the cause of this error message?
Johnny
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
2006-06-03 12:51 Hans-Christian Armingeon
@ 2006-06-04 0:48 ` Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-04 8:03 ` Keir Fraser
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans-Christian Armingeon @ 2006-06-04 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-users; +Cc: xen-devel
Hi again,
booting with irqpoll didn't fix this issue.
Any ideas?
Johnny
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 14:51 schrieb Hans-Christian Armingeon:
> Hi,
>
> I am running
> xen unstable hg from 2006-06-03
> 2.6.16.19 pathced with xen unstable hg from 2006-06-02
>
> I get this error message.
>
> [ 1199.028108] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> [ 1199.031054]
> [ 1199.031055] Call Trace: <IRQ> <ffffffff8014d754>{__report_bad_irq+48}
> [ 1199.034294] <ffffffff8014d9bc>{note_interrupt+539} <ffffffff8014d2ab>{__do_IRQ+190}
> [ 1199.040504] <ffffffff8010c934>{do_IRQ+62} <ffffffff802d0034>{evtchn_do_upcall+132}
> [ 1199.046403] <ffffffff8010b152>{do_hypervisor_callback+30} <EOI>
> [ 1199.052363] handlers:
> [ 1199.055141] [<ffffffff880354ab>] (ata_interrupt+0x0/0x166 [libata])
> [ 1199.058267] Disabling IRQ #17
>
> So I rebooted with irqpoll option.
>
> Is this a bug, or what's the cause of this error message?
>
>
> Johnny
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
2006-06-03 12:51 Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-04 0:48 ` Hans-Christian Armingeon
@ 2006-06-04 8:03 ` Keir Fraser
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2006-06-04 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans-Christian Armingeon; +Cc: xen-devel, xen-users
On 3 Jun 2006, at 13:51, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote:
> [ 1199.028108] irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll"
> option)
> [ 1199.031054]
> [ 1199.031055] Call Trace: <IRQ>
> <ffffffff8014d754>{__report_bad_irq+48}
> [ 1199.034294] <ffffffff8014d9bc>{note_interrupt+539}
> <ffffffff8014d2ab>{__do_IRQ+190}
> [ 1199.040504] <ffffffff8010c934>{do_IRQ+62}
> <ffffffff802d0034>{evtchn_do_upcall+132}
> [ 1199.046403] <ffffffff8010b152>{do_hypervisor_callback+30}
> <EOI>
> [ 1199.052363] handlers:
> [ 1199.055141] [<ffffffff880354ab>] (ata_interrupt+0x0/0x166 [libata])
> [ 1199.058267] Disabling IRQ #17
>
> So I rebooted with irqpoll option.
>
> Is this a bug, or what's the cause of this error message?
It's caused by receiving lots of spurious interrupts on that IRQ. If
you don't see similar on native then post boot output from Xen and
native Linux and we can look for differences.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-18 0:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-27 20:07 irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Gunnar Zarncke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-18 0:02 Justin Mattock
2006-06-03 12:51 Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-04 0:48 ` Hans-Christian Armingeon
2006-06-04 8:03 ` Keir Fraser
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.