From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Subject: Re: asm-generic/tlb.h and check_pgt_cache()
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:31:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47A1F7C5.3020108@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080131130328.GA29209@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:54:25PM +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Commit a5a19c63f4e55e32dc0bc3d936d7f94793d8b380 from x86.git seems to
>> have broken several architectures, including alpha (fixed by
>> c18d1250c7425dddd2633ce4eaf03d5015e68a0f) and avr32 (not fixed yet).
>>
>> The problem seems to be that asm-generic/tlb.h references
>> check_pgt_cache(), which is defined in asm/pgalloc.h on most
>> architectures, so removing that include seems like the wrong thing to
>> do. x86, however, defines it in asm/pgtable.h which is apparently
>> included indirectly through other headers.
>>
>> One way to fix this would be to move the check_pgt_cache() definition
>> over to asm/pgtable.h, but I suspect this would complicate things a lot
>> on architectures that use quicklists since they need the QUICK_*
>> definitions from pgalloc.h in order to implement check_pgt_cache. I
>> have patches that make avr32 use quicklists as well, so I'm a bit
>> hesitant to do this.
>>
>> Another way to fix it would be to include asm/pgalloc.h elsewhere, e.g.
>> from asm/tlb.h right before including asm-generic/tlb.h. Or perhaps we
>> should move check_pgt_cache() into asm/tlb.h on all architectures and
>> include asm/pgalloc.h as needed?
>>
>> I don't know how many architectures are currently broken -- if it's
>> only avr32, I can probably come up with a way to fix it on my own. But
>> if there are others, I thought it might be a good idea to coordinate
>> things.
>>
>
> At least blackfin and m32r suffer from the same compile breakage.
>
Huh, interesting: avr32, sh, blackfin and m32r - all a similar class of
architectures. Does this show a genealogical relationship?
Anyway, sorry about the breakage. There's a cyclic dependency between
asm-generic/tlb.h and asm/pgalloc.h, since __*_free_tlb (often) uses
tlb_remove_page().
From the look of it:
avr32 - no-op check_pgt_list
sh - uses quicklist_*, and defines QUICK_* (unique among architectures)
blackfin - how does this break? asm-blackfin/pgalloc.h is more or less no-op
m32r - no-op check_pgt_list
um - no-op check_pgt_list
I'm guessing in blackfin's case, the breakage is some indirect
dependency on asm-blackfin/pgalloc.h via asm/tlb.h->asm-generic/tlb.h
rather than a specific check_pgt_list() problem. Adrian, is that
right? That should be fixable by putting #include <asm/pgalloc.h> in
the appropriate places.
um also has a fairly simply pgalloc.h with no dependency on
asm-generic/tlb.h, so I assume the breakage there is also the result of
an indirect pgalloc.h dependency.
For avr32 and m32r there should be no problem in moving the no-op
check_pgt_list() definition to somewhere else, like asm-*/pgtable.h.
The only tricky case seems to be sh. That needs a bit more thought.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-31 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-31 11:54 asm-generic/tlb.h and check_pgt_cache() Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-01-31 12:18 ` Paul Mundt
2008-01-31 13:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 15:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 16:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-01-31 16:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-31 17:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-02-01 0:09 ` Paul Mundt
2008-02-01 0:31 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47A1F7C5.3020108@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.