Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/4] Modify resource counters to add soft limit support

[Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>>> Balbir Singh wrote:
>>> Resource counter accounts for arbitrary resource. Memory pressure
>>> and memory reclamation both only make sense in case we're dealing
>>> with memory controller. Please, remove this comment or move it to
>>> memcontrol.c.
>>>
>> Yes, they always have. The concept of soft limits, hard limits, guarantees
>> applies to all resources. Why do you say they apply only to memory controller? I
> 
> I said that *memory pressure and memory reclamation*, not the soft limits
> in general, applies to memory controller only :)
> 

I suspected that, that's why I asked if I should change the comment to make it
generic :) I'll make that change in the next revision of the patches.

>> can change the comment to make the definition generic for all resources.
>>

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>